Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29258432›Full record

Observational studyBMC anesthesiology2017

The beneficial use of ultramicronized palmitoylethanolamide as add-on therapy to Tapentadol in the treatment of low back pain: a pilot study comparing prospective and retrospective observational arms.

Maria Beatrice Passavanti, Marco Fiore, Pasquale Sansone, Caterina Aurilio, Vincenzo Pota, Manlio Barbarisi, Daniela Fierro, Maria Caterina Pace

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC anesthesiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A systematic review of treatment for patients with burning mouth syndrome.Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Management of Traumatic Brain Injury: From Present to Future.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maria Beatrice PassavantiDepartment of Women, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138, Naples, Italy.
Marco FioreDepartment of Women, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138, Naples, Italy. marco.fiore@unicampania.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7263-0229
Pasquale SansoneDepartment of Women, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138, Naples, Italy.
Caterina AurilioDepartment of Women, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138, Naples, Italy.
Vincenzo PotaDepartment of Women, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138, Naples, Italy.
Manlio BarbarisiDepartment of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic and Aging Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Piazza L. Miraglia, 2, 80138, Naples, Italy.
Daniela FierroDepartment of Women, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138, Naples, Italy.
Maria Caterina PaceDepartment of Women, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138, Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis pilot study was designed to compare the efficacy of ultramicronized palmitoylethanolamide (um-PEA) as add-on therapy to tapentadol (TP) with TP therapy only in patients suffering from chronic low back pain (LBP).

methodsThis pilot observational study consists in two arms: the prospective arm and the retrospective one. In the prospective arm patients consecutively selected received um-PEA as add-on therapy to TP for 6 months; in the retrospective arm patients were treated with TP only for 6 months. Pain intensity and neuropathic component were evaluated at baseline, during and after 6 months. The degree of disability and TP dosage assumption were evaluated at baseline and after 6 months.

resultsStatistical analysis performed with generalized linear mixed model on 55 patients (30 in the prospective group and 25 in the retrospective group) demonstrated that um-PEA as add-on treatment to TP in patients with chronic LBP, in comparison to TP alone, led to a significantly higher reduction in pain intensity, in the neuropathic component, the degree of disability and TP dosage assumption. No serious side effects were observed.

conclusionOverall, the present findings suggest that um-PEA may be an innovative therapeutic intervention as add-on therapy to TP for the management of chronic LBP with a neuropathic component, as well as to improve patient quality of life. Additionally, this combination treatment allowed a reduction in TP dose over time and did not show any serious side effects.

Indexed as

AgedAmidesAnalgesicsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug CompoundingDrug Therapy, CombinationEthanolaminesFemaleHumansLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedPalmitic AcidsPhenolsPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesAmidesAnalgesicsEthanolaminespalmidrolPalmitic AcidsPhenolsTapentadolAdd-on therapyLow back painPain medicineTapentadolUltramicronized palmitoylethanolamide

Identifiers

PMID29258432
PMCPMC5735888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.