Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29258291›Full record

ArticleNature2018

Successful conservation of global waterbird populations depends on effective governance.

Tatsuya Amano, Tamás Székely, Brody Sandel, Szabolcs Nagy, Taej Mundkur, Tom Langendoen, Daniel Blanco, Candan U Soykan, William J Sutherland

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Shorebird loss increases soil COFundamental research · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Role of national regime ideology for predicting biodiversity outcomes.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Exposure of wetlands important for nonbreeding waterbirds to sea-level rise in the Mediterranean.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. The role of funding in the performance of Latin America's protected areas.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Intentional release of native species undermines ecological stability.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Eyebirds: Enabling the Public to Recognize Water Birds at Hand.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  20. Protected area characteristics that help waterbirds respond to climate warming.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tatsuya AmanoConservation Science Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, The David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, Cambridge, CB2 3QZ, UK.
Tamás SzékelyMilner Centre for Evolution, Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
Brody SandelDepartment of Biology, Santa Clara University, 500 El Camino Real, Santa Clara, California 95053, USA.
Szabolcs NagyWetlands International Head Office, Horapark 9, 6717 LZ Ede, The Netherlands.
Taej MundkurWetlands International Head Office, Horapark 9, 6717 LZ Ede, The Netherlands.
Tom LangendoenWetlands International Head Office, Horapark 9, 6717 LZ Ede, The Netherlands.
Daniel BlancoWetlands International LAC Argentina Office, Capitán General Ramón Freire 1512, Buenos Aires 1426, Argentina.
Candan U SoykanNational Audubon Society, Conservation Science, 220 Montgomery St., Suite 1000, San Francisco, California 94104, USA.
William J SutherlandConservation Science Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, The David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, Cambridge, CB2 3QZ, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding global patterns of biodiversity change is crucial for conservation research, policies and practices. However, for most ecosystems, the lack of systematically collected data at a global level limits our understanding of biodiversity changes and their local-scale drivers. Here we address this challenge by focusing on wetlands, which are among the most biodiverse and productive of any environments and which provide essential ecosystem services, but are also amongst the most seriously threatened ecosystems. Using birds as an indicator taxon of wetland biodiversity, we model time-series abundance data for 461 waterbird species at 25,769 survey sites across the globe. We show that the strongest predictor of changes in waterbird abundance, and of conservation efforts having beneficial effects, is the effective governance of a country. In areas in which governance is on average less effective, such as western and central Asia, sub-Saharan Africa and South America, waterbird declines are particularly pronounced; a higher protected area coverage of wetland environments facilitates waterbird increases, but only in countries with more effective governance. Our findings highlight that sociopolitical instability can lead to biodiversity loss and undermine the benefit of existing conservation efforts, such as the expansion of protected area coverage. Furthermore, data deficiencies in areas with less effective governance could lead to underestimations of the extent of the current biodiversity crisis.

Indexed as

BiodiversityBirdsInternational CooperationWetlandsAfricaAnimalsAsiaConservation of Natural ResourcesGeographic MappingPopulation DensitySouth AmericaSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID29258291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.