ArticleOmics : a journal of integrative biology2017
What Is Trust? Ethics and Risk Governance in Precision Medicine and Predictive Analytics.
Article in Omics : a journal of integrative biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond mistrust: Diverse biobanking preferences among parents and adolescents with sickle cell disease.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2026Article
- The ethical aspects of human organ-on-chip models: A mapping review.Stem cell reports · 2025Review
- A citizen-centred approach to public engagement on the ethical, legal and societal issues of health technologies.Public understanding of science (Bristol, England) · 2025Article
- A scoping review of ethical aspects of public-private partnerships in digital health.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Patient and Caregiver Perceptions on the Allocation Process and Waitlist, and Accepting a Less-Than-Ideal Kidney: A Canadian Survey.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2025Article
- Caregiver and Youth Characteristics That Influence Trust in Digital Health Platforms in Pediatric Care: Mixed Methods Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Willingness to participate in a personalized health cohort - insights from the swiss health study pilot phase.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Research agenda for using artificial intelligence in health governance: interpretive scoping review and framework.BioData mining · 2023Article
- Public values and guiding principles for implementing epitope compatibility in kidney transplantation allocation criteria: results from a Canadian online public deliberation.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Before and beyond trust: reliance in medical AI.Journal of medical ethics · 2022Article
- Exploring the Interdisciplinary Nature of Precision Medicine：Network Analysis and Visualization.JMIR medical informatics · 2021Article
- A qualitative study of big data and the opioid epidemic: recommendations for data governance.BMC medical ethics · 2020Article
- Light-Sensitive Membrane Proteins as Tools to Generate Precision Treatments.The Journal of membrane biology · 2020Article
- A governance model for the application of AI in health care.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020Article
- Structural racism in precision medicine: leaving no one behind.BMC medical ethics · 2020Article
- Consumer-Mediated Data Exchange for Research: Current State of US Law, Technology, and Trust.JMIR medical informatics · 2019Article
- Importance of Participant-Centricity and Trust for a Sustainable Medical Information Commons.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2019Article
- Hopeful and Concerned: Public Input on Building a Trustworthy Medical Information Commons.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2019Article
- Genomic Data-Sharing Practices.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2019Article
- Elements of Trust in Digital Health Systems: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Trust is a ubiquitous term used in emerging technology (e.g., Big Data, precision medicine), innovation policy, and governance literatures in particular. But what exactly is trust? Even though trust is considered a critical requirement for the successful deployment of precision medicine initiatives, nonetheless, there is a need for further conceptualization with regard to what qualifies as trust, and what factors might establish and sustain trust in precision medicine, predictive analytics, and large-scale biology. These new fields of 21st century medicine and health often deal with the "futures" and hence, trust gains a temporal and ever-present quality for both the present and the futures anticipated by new technologies and predictive analytics. We address these conceptual gaps that have important practical implications in the way we govern risk and unknowns associated with emerging technologies in biology, medicine, and health broadly. We provide an in-depth conceptual analysis and an operative definition of trust dynamics in precision medicine. In addition, we identify three main types of "trust facilitators": (1) technical, (2) ethical, and (3) institutional. This three-dimensional framework on trust is necessary to building and maintaining trust in 21st century knowledge-based innovations that governments and publics invest for progressive societal change, development, and sustainable prosperity. Importantly, we analyze, identify, and deliberate on the dimensions of precision medicine and large-scale biology that have carved out trust as a pertinent tool to its success. Moving forward, we propose a "points to consider" on how best to enhance trust in precision medicine and predictive analytics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.