ArticleMolecular medicine reports2018
Quantification of distinct let-7 microRNA family members by a modified stem-loop RT-qPCR.
Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- An Optimized RT-qPCR Protocol for Comprehensive Analysis of microRNAs and mRNAs inNon-coding RNA · 2026Article
- Multiplexed Single-Molecule Detection of Nucleic Acid Biomarkers with a Distance-Tuned Single FRET Pair.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
- LIN28 upregulation in primary human T cells impaired CAR T antitumoral activity.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- New Tricks with Old Dogs: Computational Identification and Experimental Validation of New miRNA-mRNA Regulation in hiPSC-CMs.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- Advances of Exosomal miRNAs in Breast Cancer Progression and Diagnosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Ultrasensitive detection of nucleic acids using deformed graphene channel field effect biosensors.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lethal-7 (let-7) microRNA (miRNA) serves a pivotal role in a number of physiological processes and is associated with the occurrence and development of multiple disorders such as cancer. The present study aimed to use a newly developed stem‑loop strategy for reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT‑qPCR) to distinguish let‑7 miRNA family members that differ by as little as a single nucleotide. For the miRNAs comprising 16 identical nucleotides at the 5'‑end, different stem‑loop RT primers were designed and used in RT‑qPCR to assess the expression profiles of a panel of let‑7 family member miRNAs in human glioblastoma U87 cells. Amplification efficiency was evaluated through correlation analysis between total RNA input and the quantification threshold values. Melting curve profiles were measured to estimate the amplification specificity of the improved stem‑loop RT‑qPCR compared with those of the poly(A)‑tailing method. In addition, the discrimination ability of the modified stem‑loop method was examined. Compared with poly(A) tailing, the modified stem‑loop RT method was able to specifically reverse transcribe the diverse let‑7 miRNA family members followed by accurate quantification, with a theoretical amplification efficiency of ~100%. This modified stem‑loop method was able to distinguish miRNAs with a single base difference. This innovative method may be used in the clinical detection of let‑7 expression levels in a variety of tumour samples, and may provide valuable data for disease diagnosis and prognostic evaluation. In addition, this method may offer a new avenue for developing particular stem‑loop approaches in measuring other miRNAs with little discrepancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.