ArticleMolecular medicine reports2018
Effects of oral implants with miR‑122‑modified cell sheets on rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells.
Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- MicroRNAs-mediated regulation of the differentiation of dental pulp-derived mesenchymal stem cells: a systematic review and bioinformatic analysis.Stem cell research & therapy · 2023Pooled it
- Epigenetic factors associated with peri-implantitis: a review.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2025Review
- Article
- Implant surface modifications and their impact on osseointegration and peri-implant diseases through epigenetic changes: A scoping review.Journal of periodontal research · 2024Article
- Do alkaline phosphatases have great potential in the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of tumors?Translational cancer research · 2023Review
- Non-viral gene delivery to human mesenchymal stem cells: a practical guide towards cell engineering.Journal of biological engineering · 2023Review
- Modification of implant surfaces to stimulate mesenchymal cell activation.Bulletin of the National Research Centre · 2022Review
- MiRNA-Nanofiber, the Next Generation of Bioactive Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration: A Review.Micromachines · 2021Review
- The Role of Epigenetic Functionalization of Implants and Biomaterials in Osseointegration and Bone Regeneration-A Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- RNA-based scaffolds for bone regeneration: application and mechanisms of mRNA, miRNA and siRNA.Theranostics · 2020Review
- Targeted induction of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells to have effectiveness on diabetic pancreatic restoration.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal · 2019Article
- The Potential of Different Origin Stem Cells in Modulating Oral Bone Regeneration Processes.Cells · 2019Review
- Selective adipogenic differentiation of human periodontal ligament stem cells stimulated with high doses of glucose.PloS one · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to regulate the transformation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMMSCs) to osteoblasts to promote bone formation and osseointegration surrounding oral implants. BMMSCs were cultured using the whole bone marrow adherence method. Cell surface markers were detected by flow cytometry, and multi‑lineage differentiation potential was detected by osteogenic and adipogenic tests. miR‑122‑modified cell sheets were prepared by non‑viral transfection and complexed with micro‑arc titanium oxide implants to construct a gene‑modified tissue‑engineered implant, with its surface morphology observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). In vitro osteogenic activity of the implant was determined by alkaline phosphatase (ALP), Sirius Red, alizarin red staining, polymerase chain reaction and western blot analysis. The BMMSCs were spindle‑ or triangular‑shaped. Surface markers, cluster of differentiation 29 (CD29), CD90 and CD105 were positively expressed, whereas blood cell markers CD34, CD45 and CD31 were negatively expressed. Osteogenic staining exhibited deposition of calcified nodules, while adipogenic staining demonstrated the formation of lipid droplets. miR‑122 modification significantly enhanced the in vitro osteogenic activity of the sheets. On day 3 of osteogenic induction, runt-related transcription factor 2, osterix, osteocalcin, collagen I, ALP and bone morphogenetic protein 2 expression levels of the experimental group were 2.0, 3.1, 4.6, 3.2, 10.5 and 4.5 times those of the blank control group, respectively. SEM imaging of the modified sheet demonstrated close adhesion and fitting between abundant cellular and extracellular matrices, and the porous surface of the implant. In vitro osteogenesis of the complex was promoted and accelerated. Thus, miR‑122 effectively promoted osteogenic differentiation of the BMMSC sheet. Therefore, it is feasible to construct gene‑modified tissue‑engineered implants by complexing miR‑122‑modified sheets with micro‑arc titanium oxide implants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.