ReviewGenes2017
Genome Editing Tools in Plants.
Review in Genes, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emerging applications of gene editing technologies for the development of climate-resilient crops.Frontiers in genome editing · 2025Review
- Revolutionizing Tomato Cultivation: CRISPR/Cas9 Mediated Biotic Stress Resistance.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Review
- Transcriptional engineering for value enhancement of oilseed crops: a forward perspective.Frontiers in genome editing · 2024Review
- Putting CRISPR-Cas system in action: a golden window for efficient and precise genome editing for crop improvement.GM crops & food · 2023Review
- CRISPR/Cas9: a powerful tool in colorectal cancer research.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2023Review
- Genome Editing and Improvement of Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Crop Plants.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Eliciting Targeted Mutations in Medicago sativa Using CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing: A Potential Tool for the Improvement of Disease Resistance.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- CRISPR-Based Genome Editing: Advancements and Opportunities for Rice Improvement.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Biotechnological approach for improvement ofRSC advances · 2022Review
- Current Status and Perspectives on the Application of CRISPR/Cas9 Gene-Editing System to Develop a Low-Gluten, Non-Transgenic Wheat Variety.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Novel and emerging biotechnological crop protection approaches.Plant biotechnology journal · 2021Review
- Biotechnological Resources to Increase Disease-Resistance by Improving Plant Immunity: A Sustainable Approach to Save Cereal Crop Production.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- CRISPR-Based Genome Editing Tools: Insights into Technological Breakthroughs and Future Challenges.Genes · 2021Review
- From Traditional Breeding to Genome Editing for Boosting Productivity of the Ancient Grain Tef [Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Application of Genome Editing in Tomato Breeding: Mechanisms, Advances, and Prospects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Space Breeding: The Next-Generation Crops.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Review
- Overview and detectability of the genetic modifications in ornamental plants.Horticulture research · 2020Review
- Genome-wide analysis of cotton C2H2-zinc finger transcription factor family and their expression analysis during fiber development.BMC plant biology · 2019Article
- Detection and Identification of Genome Editing in Plants: Challenges and Opportunities.Frontiers in plant science · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genome editing tools have the potential to change the genomic architecture of a genome at precise locations, with desired accuracy. These tools have been efficiently used for trait discovery and for the generation of plants with high crop yields and resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses. Due to complex genomic architecture, it is challenging to edit all of the genes/genomes using a particular genome editing tool. Therefore, to overcome this challenging task, several genome editing tools have been developed to facilitate efficient genome editing. Some of the major genome editing tools used to edit plant genomes are: Homologous recombination (HR), zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), pentatricopeptide repeat proteins (PPRs), the CRISPR/Cas9 system, RNA interference (RNAi), cisgenesis, and intragenesis. In addition, site-directed sequence editing and oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis have the potential to edit the genome at the single-nucleotide level. Recently, adenine base editors (ABEs) have been developed to mutate A-T base pairs to G-C base pairs. ABEs use deoxyadeninedeaminase (TadA) with catalytically impaired Cas9 nickase to mutate A-T base pairs to G-C base pairs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.