Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29257053›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2017

How Do the First Days Count? A Case Study of Qatar Experience in Emergency Risk Communication during the MERS-CoV Outbreak.

Mohamed Nour, Mohd Alhajri, Elmoubasher A B A Farag, Hamad E Al-Romaihi, Mohamed Al-Thani, Salih Al-Marri, Elena Savoia

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mohamed NourMinistry of Public Health, Doha 11111, Qatar. mnour@moph.gov.qa.
Mohd AlhajriMinistry of Public Health, Doha 11111, Qatar. malhajri1@moph.gov.qa.
Elmoubasher A B A FaragMinistry of Public Health, Doha 11111, Qatar. eabdfarag@moph.gov.qa.
Hamad E Al-RomaihiMinistry of Public Health, Doha 11111, Qatar. halromaihi@moph.gov.qa.
Mohamed Al-ThaniMinistry of Public Health, Doha 11111, Qatar. malthani@moph.gov.qa.
Salih Al-MarriMinistry of Public Health, Doha 11111, Qatar. dralmarri@moph.gov.qa.
Elena SavoiaDivision of Policy Translation & Leadership Development, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA. esavoia@hsph.harvard.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This case study is the first to be developed in the Middle East region to document what happened during the response to the 2013 MERS outbreak in Qatar. It provides a description of key epidemiologic events and news released from a prime daily newspaper and main Emergency Risk Communication (ERC) actions that were undertaken by public health authorities. Using the Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication (CERC) theoretical framework, the study analyzes how the performed ERC strategies during the first days of the outbreak might have contributed to the outbreak management.

methodsMERS-CoV related events were chronologically tracked, together with the relevant stories that were published in a major newspaper over the course of three distinct phases of the epidemic. The collected media stories were then assessed against the practiced emergency risk communication (ERC) activities during the same time frame.

resultsThe Crisis & Emergency Risk Communication (CERC) framework was partially followed during the early days of the MERS-CoV epidemic, which were characterized by overwhelming uncertainty. The SCH's commitment to a proactive and open risk communication strategy since day one, contributed to creating the SCH's image as a credible source of information and allowed for the quick initiation of the overall response efforts. Yet, conflicting messages and over reassurance were among the observed pitfalls of the implemented ERC strategy.

conclusionThe adoption of CERC principles can help restore and maintain the credibility of responding agencies. Further work is needed to develop more rigorous and comprehensive research strategies that address sharing of information by mainstream as well as social media for a more accurate assessment of the impact of the ERC strategy.

Indexed as

Coronavirus InfectionsDisease OutbreaksHealth CommunicationHumansMiddle East Respiratory Syndrome CoronavirusPublic HealthQatarRiskTime FactorsCERCcoordinationemergency risk communicationMERSoutbreakQatar

Identifiers

PMID29257053
PMCPMC5751014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.