Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29256375›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2017

Using Telemetry Data to Refine Endpoints for New Zealand White Rabbits Challenged with

David G Dawson, Kristin A Bower, Candace N Burnette, Rebecca K Holt, James R Swearengen, Paul A Dabisch, Angelo Scorpio

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Physiological Responses to a Single Low-Dose ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

David G DawsonNational Biological Threat Characterization Center, National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center, Frederick, Maryland.
Kristin A BowerNational Biological Threat Characterization Center, National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center, Frederick, Maryland.
Candace N BurnetteNational Biological Threat Characterization Center, National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center, Frederick, Maryland.
Rebecca K HoltNational Biological Threat Characterization Center, National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center, Frederick, Maryland.
James R SwearengenNational Biological Threat Characterization Center, National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center, Frederick, Maryland.
Paul A DabischNational Biological Threat Characterization Center, National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center, Frederick, Maryland.
Angelo ScorpioNational Biological Threat Characterization Center, National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center, Frederick, Maryland;, Email: angelo.scorpio@nbacc.dhs.gov.
Chemring Countermeasures (United Kingdom) · GBNational College · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We used a continuous-monitoring digital telemetry system to investigate temperature response in New Zealand White rabbits after inhalation or subcutaneous challenge with Bacillus anthracis. Two spore preparations of B. anthracis Ames A2084 were evaluated by using a nose-only inhalation model, and 2 strains, B. anthracis Ames A2084 and B. anthracis UT500, were evaluated in a subcutaneous model. Animal body temperature greater than 3 SD above the mean baseline temperature was considered a significant increase in body temperature (SIBT). All rabbits that exhibited SIBT after challenge by either route of infection or bacterial strain eventually died or were euthanized due to infection, and all rabbits that died or were euthanized due to infection exhibited SIBT during the course of disease. The time at onset of SIBT preceded clinical signs of disease in 94% of the rabbits tested by as long as 2 days. In addition, continuous temperature monitoring facilitated discrimination between the 2 B. anthracis strains with regard to the time interval between SIBT and death. These data suggest that for the New Zealand White rabbit anthrax model, SIBT is a reliable indicator of infection, is predictive of experimental outcome in the absence of treatment, and is measurable prior to the appearance of more severe signs of disease. The use of digital telemetry to monitor infectious disease course in animal models of anthrax can potentially be used in conjunction with other clinical score metrics to refine endpoint euthanasia criteria.

Indexed as

RabbitsAerosolsAnimalsAnimals, LaboratoryAnthraxBacillus anthracisBody TemperatureDisease Models, AnimalFeverInhalationTelemetryAerosols

Identifiers

PMID29256375
PMCPMC5710159
OpenAlexW2981352661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.