Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29256174›Full record

Observational studyEating and weight disorders : EWD2019

Analysis of Portuguese language blogs about bariatric surgery: key doubts of internauts regarding the postoperative period.

Lívia Moreira Barros, Natasha Marques Frota, Thiago Moura de Araújo, Michelle Tellez, Heloisa Helena Peres Ciqueto, Joselany Áfio Caetano

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Eating and weight disorders : EWD, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lívia Moreira BarrosGraduate Program in Nursing, Federal University of Ceará (UFC), Fortaleza, CE, Brazil. livia.moreirab@hotmail.com.
Natasha Marques FrotaGraduate Program in Nursing, Federal University of Ceará (UFC), Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Thiago Moura de AraújoNursing Department, University of International Integration of the Afro-Brazilian Lusophony (UNILAB), Redenção, CE, Brazil.
Michelle TellezUniversity of California, East Bay, Concord, CA, USA.
Heloisa Helena Peres CiquetoUniversity of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Joselany Áfio CaetanoNursing Department, UFC, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Internet, particularly blogs have become an important tool for patients to disseminate and exchange information on a variety of health topics, including bariatric surgery. By virtue of its interactivity being free of judgement from health care providers, blogs expose gaps in patients' knowledge and understanding. PURPOSE: This study analyzes the main doubts expressed in blogs by patients in the postoperative period of bariatric surgery.

methodThis is a qualitative exploratory study of 11 blogs of patients, who underwent bariatric surgery, that were available on the Internet between October 2013 and May 2017. The data were collected through a structured instrument and analyzed according to Bardin's suggestions. The sampling method used was intentional.

resultsEvolution of diet, weight loss, plateau effect, weight regain, physical exercises, physiological changes, complications, use of contraceptive and pregnancy were the main areas of concern.

conclusionMore needs to be done to educate and prepare bariatric patients for the postoperative period. The content found in blogs serves towards building better links with patients, helps them make better decisions, and provides them an opportunity to be active participants in their own treatment.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryBloggingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeInternetAdultBrazilFemaleHumansInformation DisseminationMalePostoperative PeriodQualitative ResearchYoung AdultBariatric surgeryInformationInternetPostoperative period

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.