ReviewDrugs & aging2018
Treatment of Older Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia.
Review in Drugs & aging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024Review
- VpreB surrogate light chain expression in B-lineage ALL: a report from the Children's Oncology Group.Blood advances · 2022Article
- Characteristics and Outcome of Elderly Patients (>55 Years) with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.Cancers · 2022Article
- Article
- New targets for therapy: antigen identification in adults with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The outcome of adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) has improved significantly during the past decade, mainly due to intensive paediatric-based chemotherapy. Less improvement has been observed in older patients. A significantly lower rate of complete remissions, higher early mortality, higher relapse rate and poorer survival is observed in older compared with younger ALL patients. Most importantly, intensive chemotherapy with or without stem-cell transplantation is less well tolerated in older patients. In addition, there is an increasing incidence of poor prognostic factors with increasing age. Progress has been made with the development of age-adapted, moderately intensive chemotherapy protocols for Ph/BCR-ABL-negative ALL and combinations of tyrosine kinase inhibitors with chemotherapy in Ph/BCR-ABL-positive ALL. Future progress can be expected from new targeted therapies, particularly novel immunotherapies, moderately intensified consolidation strategies and reduced intensity stem-cell transplantation. For this purpose, prospective clinical trials for older patients are urgently needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.