Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29255969›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2017

Recombinant entomopathogenic agents: a review of biotechnological approaches to pest insect control.

Salih Karabörklü, Ugur Azizoglu, Zehra Busra Azizoglu

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A taste of one's own medicine:Frontiers in immunology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. RecombinantMicrobiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Plant-AssociatedPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Mortality ofJournal of nematology · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Salih KarabörklüDepartment of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Sciences, Duzce University, Duzce, Turkey.
Ugur AzizogluDepartment of Crop and Animal Production, Tomarza Mustafa Akıncıoğlu Vocational College, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey. azizoglu@erciyes.edu.tr.
Zehra Busra AzizogluGraduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.
Erciyes University · TRDüzce Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the use of chemical pesticides has decreased in recent years, it is still a common method of pest control. However, chemical use leads to challenging problems. The harm caused by these chemicals and the length of time that they will remain in the environment is of great concern to the future and safety of humans. Therefore, developing new pest control agents that are safer and environmentally compatible, as well as assuring their widespread use is important. Entomopathogenic agents are microorganisms that play an important role in the biological control of pest insects and are eco-friendly alternatives to chemical control. They consist of viruses (non-cellular organisms), bacteria (prokaryotic organisms), fungi and protists (eukaryotic organisms), and nematodes (multicellular organisms). Genetic modification (recombinant technology) provides potential new methods for developing entomopathogens to manage pests. In this review, we focus on the important roles of recombinant entomopathogens in terms of pest insect control, placing them into perspective with other views to discuss, examine and evaluate the use of entomopathogenic agents in biological control.

Indexed as

BiotechnologyAgricultureAnimalsBacillus thuringiensisBacteriaBacterial Physiological PhenomenaBiological Control AgentsChitinasesCrops, AgriculturalEnzymesFungiGene DeletionGenetic EngineeringHormonesInsectaInsect ControlBiological Control AgentsChitinasesEnzymesHormonesInsect ProteinsPesticidesToxins, BiologicalEntomopathogensInsect controlMicrobial biotechnologyRecombinant technology

Identifiers

PMID29255969
OpenAlexW2775448094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.