ArticleJAMA internal medicine2018
Outcomes Associated With Left Ventricular Assist Devices Among Recipients With and Without End-stage Renal Disease.
Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.
- The impact of left ventricular assist devices on kidney function: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2026Review
- Early clinical outcomes and quality of life assessment after HeartMate 3 implantation: A single-centre descriptive study.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2026Article
- Management of Dialysis for Patients Receiving Mechanical Circulatory Support.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2026Review
- Association of Kidney Function With Myocardial Recovery and Adverse Events Following Left Ventricular Assist Device Circulatory Support.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Chronic kidney disease following left ventricular assist device implantation: contemporary insights and future perspectives.Heart failure reviews · 2025Review
- Mid-term survival in patients awaiting heart and kidney transplantation with Impella 5.5 support.ESC heart failure · 2025Article
- Outcomes of MagLev LVAD Support in Patients Requiring Preoperative Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Peritoneal Dialysis in Patients Supported by Left Ventricular Assist Device.Artificial organs · 2025Article
- Management of patients with heart failure and chronic kidney disease.Heart failure reviews · 2024Review
- Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Outcomes in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Management of Chronic Heart Failure in Dialysis Patients: A Challenging but Rewarding Path.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Cardiac Device Therapy in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: An Update.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury Requiring Dialysis and Glomerular Filtration Rate at Follow-up in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Device.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2024Article
- The impact of preoperative kidney replacement therapy on kidney outcome and survival in patients with left ventricular assist device.Renal failure · 2023Article
- Axillary mechanical circulatory support improves renal function prior to heart transplantation in patients with chronic kidney disease.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- How to Select Patients for Left Ventricular Assist Devices? A Guide for Clinical Practice.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- How to select a patient for LVAD.Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2023Review
- Long-Term Changes in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate in Left Ventricular Assist Device Recipients: A Longitudinal Joint Model Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
- Left Ventricular Assist Devices and Renal Ramifications.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
- Outcomes With Left Ventricular Assist Device in End-Stage Renal Disease: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are widely used both as a bridge to heart transplant and as destination therapy in advanced heart failure. Although heart failure is common in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), little is known about outcomes after LVAD implantation in this population. Objective: To determine the utilization of and outcomes associated with LVADs in nationally representative cohorts of patients with and without ESRD. Design, Setting and Participants: We described LVAD utilization and outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries after ESRD onset (defined as having received maintenance dialysis or a kidney transplant) from 2003 to 2013 based on Medicare claims linked to data from the United States Renal Data System (USRDS), a national registry for ESRD. We compared Medicare beneficiaries with ESRD to a 5% sample of Medicare beneficiaries without ESRD. Exposures: ESRD (vs no ESRD) among patients who underwent LVAD placement. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was survival after LVAD placement. Results: Among the patients with ESRD, the mean age was 58.4 (12.1) years and 62.0% (96) were male. Among those without ESRD, the mean age was 62.2 (12.6) years and 75.1% (196) were male. From 2003 to 2013, 155 Medicare beneficiaries with ESRD (median and interquartile range [IQR] days from ESRD onset to LVAD placement were 1655 days [453-3050 days]) and 261 beneficiaries without ESRD in the Medicare 5% sample received an LVAD. During a median follow-up of 762 days (IQR, 92-3850 days), 127 patients (81.9%) with and 95 (36.4%) without ESRD died. more than half of patients with ESRD (80 [51.6%]) compared with 11 (4%) of those without ESRD died during the index hospitalization. The median time to death was 16 days (IQR 2-447 days) for patients with ESRD compared with 2125 days (IQR, 565-3850 days) for those without ESRD. With adjustment for demographics, comorbidity and time period, patients with ESRD had a markedly increased adjusted risk of death (hazard ratio, 36.3; 95% CI, 15.6-84.5), especially in the first 60 days after LVAD placement. Conclusions and Relevance: Patients with ESRD at the time of LVAD placement had an extremely poor prognosis, with most surviving for less than 3 weeks. This information may be crucial in supporting shared decision-making around treatments for advanced heart failure for patients with ESRD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.