Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29255777›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in behavioral sciences2017

Spatial Responses, Immediate Experience, and Memory in the Monkey Hippocampus.

Jon W Rueckemann, Elizabeth A Buffalo

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in behavioral sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Sustained Hippocampal Theta Oscillations Reflect Experience-Dependent Learning in Backward Temporal Order Memory Retrieval.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. The grid code for ordered experience.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jon W RueckemannDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, 1705 NE Pacific Street, HSB Room G424, Seattle, WA USA 98195-7290.
Elizabeth A BuffaloDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, 1705 NE Pacific Street, HSB Room G424, Seattle, WA USA 98195-7290.
University of Washington · US

Funding

Washington National Primate Research CenterP51OD010425 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Mari Ostendorf · 2012 to 2026
$201.8M
Neuronal Synchronization in the Medial Temporal Lobe and Memory FormationR01MH080007 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BUFFALO, ELIZABETH A · 2008 to 2018
$4.7M
The Neural Basis of Relational MemoryR01MH093807 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BUFFALO, ELIZABETH A · 2012 to 2016
$2.6M
NIH HHS P51 OD010425NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH080007NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH093807
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Debate about the function of the hippocampus often pits theories advocating for spatial mapping against those that argue for a central role in memory. This review addresses whether research in the monkey supports the view that processing spatial information is fundamental to the function of the hippocampus. In support of spatial processing theories, neurons in the monkey hippocampal formation have striking spatial tuning, and an intact hippocampus is necessary to effectively utilize allocentric spatial relationships. However, the hippocampus also supports non-spatial processes, as its neurons acutely respond to distinct task events and hippocampal damage disrupts both expedient task acquisition and the monitoring of ongoing events in non-spatial paradigms. The features that are shared between spatial and non-spatial hippocampal-dependent tasks point toward a common mechanism underlying hippocampal function that is independent of processing spatial information. We suggest that spatial information is only one facet of immediate experience represented by the hippocampus. The current data support the idea that the hippocampus tracks many aspects of ongoing experience and the primary role of the hippocampus may be in linking experienced events into unitary episodes.

Identifiers

PMID29255777
PMCPMC5731786
OpenAlexW2753443863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.