Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29255710›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2017

Pathogen Inactivation of Cellular Blood Products-An Additional Safety Layer in Transfusion Medicine.

Axel Seltsam

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Hemoglobin Oxidation Reactions in Stored Blood.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  11. The Missing Pieces to the Cold-Stored Platelet Puzzle.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. COVID-19: benefits and risks of passive immunotherapeutics.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A Fatal Case of Septic Shock Secondary toCase reports in medicine · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Axel SeltsamGerman Red Cross Blood Service NSTOB, Institute Springe, Springe, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In line with current microbial risk reduction efforts, pathogen inactivation (PI) technologies for blood components promise to reduce the residual risk of known and emerging infectious agents. The implementation of PI of labile blood components is slowly but steadily increasing. This review discusses the relevance of PI for the field of transfusion medicine and describes the available and emerging PI technologies that can be used to treat cellular blood products such as platelet and red blood cell units. In collaboration with the French medical device manufacturer Macopharma, the German Red Cross Blood Services developed a new UVC light-based PI method for platelet units, which is currently being investigated in clinical trials.

Indexed as

pathogen inactivationplateletsred blood cellstransfusionultraviolet light

Identifiers

PMID29255710
PMCPMC5722787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.