ReviewCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2017
Myocardial computed tomography perfusion.
Review in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-contrast MRI of micro-vascularity of the feet and toes.Japanese journal of radiology · 2024Article
- Noninvasive Coronary Physiological Assessment Derived From Computed Tomography.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2024Review
- Dynamic CT Myocardial Perfusion: The Role of Functional Evaluation in the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Low-dose quantitative CT myocardial flow measurement using a single volume scan: phantom and animal validation.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2023Article
- Dynamic myocardial CT perfusion imaging-state of the art.European radiology · 2023Review
- Imaging Early Life Cardiovascular Phenotype.Circulation research · 2023Review
- The Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Chronic Coronary Syndrome: A Focus on Stress Computed Tomography Perfusion and Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Management of Coronary Artery Disease in CADASIL Patients: Review of Current Literature.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular CT and MR Imaging.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Strengths and weaknesses of alternative noninvasive imaging approaches for microvascular ischemia.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Review
- Imaging techniques for the assessment of adverse cardiac remodeling in metabolic syndrome.Heart failure reviews · 2022Review
- Definition and epidemiology of coronary microvascular disease.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022Review
- Dynamic CT myocardial perfusion without image registration.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Review
- Challenges in Diagnosis and Functional Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- The role of cardiac computed tomography in predicting adverse coronary events.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction Across the Spectrum of Cardiovascular Diseases: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2021Review
- Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction: PET, CMR and CT Assessment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Narrative review of cardiac computed tomography perfusion: insights into static rest perfusion.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2020Review
- Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite having excellent diagnostic accuracy to detect anatomical coronary stenosis, coronary CT angiography (CTA) has a limited specificity to detect myocardial ischemia. CT perfusion (CTP) can identify myocardial perfusion defects during vasodilator stress, and when added to coronary CTA, improves the specificity of detecting hemodynamically significant stenosis. A CTP protocol typically involves the acquisition of two separate data sets: (I) a rest scan that can be used as both a coronary CTA and for evaluating rest myocardial perfusion, and (II) a stress CTP scan acquired during vasodilator stress testing. This review summarizes some the techniques, strengths, and limitations of CTP, and provides an overview of the recent evidence supporting the potential use of CTP in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.