Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29255645›Full record

ArticleCurrent physical medicine and rehabilitation reports2017

Advances in Spinal Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Healthy and Injured Spinal Cords.

Ann S Choe

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current physical medicine and rehabilitation reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03854214 (Cortical Functional Connectivity as an Early Biomarker of Recovery in Spinal Cord Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03854214 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Cortical Functional Connectivity as an Early Biomarker of Recovery in Spinal Cord Injury (Study 239481)

TypeinterventionalSponsorHugo W. Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger, Inc.Ran2019 to 2023Enrolled14ConditionsSpinal Cord InjuriesArmsFunctional Electric Stimulation cycling, Passive cycling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ann S ChoeRussell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA.
Kennedy Krieger Institute · US

Funding

TR&D 4: Algorithms for functional and anatomical brain analysisP41EB015909 · NIBIB · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI MORI, SUSUMU · 2012 to 2020
$13.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015909
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review provides an overview of the current spinal functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies that investigate the healthy and injured spinal cords. RECENT

findingsSpinal fMRI-derived outcome measures have previously been suggested to be sensitive to changes in neurological function in the spinal cord. A body of recent task-activated fMRI studies seems to confirm that detecting neural activity in the spinal cord using spinal fMRI may be feasible as well as reliable. Furthermore, a growing number of studies has shown that resting state fMRI in the spinal cord is also feasible, demonstrating that the investigation of changes in neural activity can also be performed in the absence of explicit tasks. SUMMARY: Current task-activated and resting state fMRI studies suggest that spinal fMRI has a strong potential to provide novel imaging biomarkers that can be used to investigate plastic changes in the injured spinal cord.

Indexed as

resting state fMRIspinal cord injuryspinal fMRItask-activated fMRI

Identifiers

PMID29255645
PMCPMC5731656
OpenAlexW2740012923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.