Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29255600›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2017

No apparent transmission of livestock-associated methicillin-resistant

Else Toft Würtz, Jakob Hjort Bønløkke, Tinna Ravnholt Urth, Jesper Larsen, Md Zohorul Islam, Torben Sigsgaard, Vivi Schlünssen, Troels Skou, Anne Mette Madsen, Louise Feld and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Dynamic Networks of Methicillin-ResistantOpen forum infectious diseases · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Else Toft WürtzDepartment of Occupational Medicine, Danish Ramazzini Centre, Aalborg University Hospital, Havrevangen 1,4, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark.
Jakob Hjort BønløkkeDepartment of Occupational Medicine, Danish Ramazzini Centre, Aalborg University Hospital, Havrevangen 1,4, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark.
Tinna Ravnholt UrthMicrobiology and Infection Control, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jesper LarsenMicrobiology and Infection Control, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Md Zohorul IslamMicrobiology and Infection Control, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Torben SigsgaardSection of Environment, Work and Health, Department of Public Health, Danish Ramazzini Centre, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Vivi SchlünssenSection of Environment, Work and Health, Department of Public Health, Danish Ramazzini Centre, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Troels SkouSection of Environment, Work and Health, Department of Public Health, Danish Ramazzini Centre, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Anne Mette MadsenThe National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Louise FeldThe National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Saloomeh Moslehi-JenabianThe National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Robert Leo SkovMicrobiology and Infection Control, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Øyvind OmlandDepartment of Occupational Medicine, Danish Ramazzini Centre, Aalborg University Hospital, Havrevangen 1,4, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark.
National Research Centre for the Working Environment · DKStatens Serum Institut · DKDanish Ramazzini Center · DKAarhus University · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In recent years, livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Methods: This is a cross sectional study of the prevalence of LA-MRSA among hospital staff in a Danish hospital situated in a livestock production region. We analysed nasal swabs, air and dust samples for the presence of MRSA using PCR and mass spectrometry. Results: Of 1745 employees, 545 (31%) contributed nasal swabs. MRSA was not detected in any participant, nor was it detected in air or dust at the hospital or in houses of employees living on farms. Four percent of the participants had contact to pigs either directly or through household members. LA-MRSA was detected in two of 26 samples from animal sheds, both of them from pig farms. The participation rate was relatively low, but participants were representative for the source population with regards to animal contact and job titles. Conclusions: The study suggests a low point prevalence of LA-MRSA carriage in Danish hospital staff even in regions where livestock production is dense. Should more studies confirm our findings we see no need for additional hospital precautions towards LA-MRSA in Denmark at the moment. We think that our data might reduce potential stigmatization of hospital workers with contact to LA-MRSA positive farms at their work places and in their communities.

Indexed as

Cross InfectionMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusPersonnel, HospitalAnimalsCross-Sectional StudiesDenmarkEnvironmental MicrobiologyHumansLivestockMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionPublic Health SurveillanceSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationStaphylococcal InfectionsZoonosesAnimal farmingBacterial transmissionDust, Hospital employeesHospital environmentLA-MRSANasal swabs

Identifiers

PMID29255600
PMCPMC5729513
OpenAlexW2771289245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.