Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29255593›Full record

ArticleChiropractic & manual therapies2017

Research priorities of the Canadian chiropractic profession: a consensus study using a modified Delphi technique.

Simon D French, Peter J H Beliveau, Paul Bruno, Steven R Passmore, Jill A Hayden, John Srbely, Greg N Kawchuk

Open access · goldAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Chiropractic & manual therapies, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Investigating the research capacity and productivity of Canadian sports chiropractors.The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Informing a research agenda for the Canadian chiropractic profession.The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Simon D FrenchSchool of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Louise D. Acton Building, 31 George St, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6 Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7061-7706
Peter J H BeliveauSchool of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Louise D. Acton Building, 31 George St, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6 Canada.
Paul BrunoFaculty of Kinesiology and Health Studies, University of Regina, Regina, SK Canada.
Steven R PassmoreFaculty of Kinesiology & Recreation Management, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB Canada.
Jill A HaydenDepartment of Community Health & Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS Canada.
John SrbelyHuman Health & Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON Canada.
Greg N KawchukFaculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB Canada.
Queen's University · CADalhousie University · CAUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Guelph · CAUniversity of Manitoba · CAUniversity of Regina · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Research funds are limited and a healthcare profession that supports research activity should establish research priority areas. The study objective was to identify research priority areas for the Canadian chiropractic profession, and for stakeholders in the chiropractic profession to rank these in order of importance. Methods: We conducted a modified Delphi consensus study between August 2015 and May 2017 to determine the views of Canadian chiropractic organisations (e.g. Canadian Chiropractic Association; provincial associations) and stakeholder groups (e.g. chiropractic educational institutions; researchers). Participants completed three online Delphi survey rounds. In Round 1, participants suggested research areas within four broad research themes: 1) Basic science; 2) Clinical; 3) Health services; and 4) Population health. In Round 2, researchers created sub-themes by categorising the areas suggested in Round 1, and participants judged the importance of the research sub-themes. We defined consensus as at least 70% of participants agreeing that a research area was "essential" or "very important". In Round 3, results from Round 2 were presented to the participants to re-evaluate the importance of sub-themes. Finally, participants completed an online pairwise ranking activity to determine the rank order of the list of important research sub-themes. Results: Fifty-seven participants, of 85 people invited, completed Round 1 (response rate 67%). Fifty-six participants completed Round 2, 55 completed Round 3, and 53 completed the ranking activity. After three Delphi rounds and the pairwise ranking activity was completed, the ranked list of research sub-themes considered important were: 1) Integration of chiropractic care into multidisciplinary settings; 2) Costs and cost-effectiveness of chiropractic care; 3) Effect of chiropractic care on reducing medical services; 4) Effects of chiropractic care; 5) Safety/side effects of chiropractic care; 6) Chiropractic care for older adults; 7) Neurophysiological mechanisms and effects of spinal manipulative therapy; 8) General mechanisms and effects of spinal manipulative therapy. Conclusions: This project identified research priority areas for the Canadian chiropractic profession. The top three priority areas were all in the area of health services research: 1) Integration of chiropractic care into multidisciplinary settings; 2) Costs and cost-effectiveness of chiropractic care; 3) Effect of chiropractic care on reducing medical services.

Indexed as

ChiropracticHealth PrioritiesManipulation, ChiropracticResearchCanadaDelphi TechniqueHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesCanadaChiropractic professionDelphi studyResearch priorities

Identifiers

PMID29255593
PMCPMC5727882
OpenAlexW2771216193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.