Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29255579›Full record

ArticleMiddle East journal of digestive diseases2017

Bowel Preparation for a Better Colonoscopy Using Polyethylene Glycol or C-lax: A Double Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.

Rose Khorasanynejad, Alireza Norouzi, Gholamreza Roshandel, Sima Besharat

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Middle East journal of digestive diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy of ultra-low volume (≤1 L) bowel preparation fluids: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Split dose bowel preparation before colonoscopy of PEG (Nulytely) in comparison to routine single dose bowel preparation.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rose KhorasanynejadAssistant of cardiology, Department of Cardiology, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Alireza NorouziGastroentrologist, Golestan Research Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.
Gholamreza RoshandelEpidemiologist, Golestan Research Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.
Sima BesharatPhD of Biomedicine, Golestan Research Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.
Golestan University · IRGolestan University of Medical Sciences · IRMashhad University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Ideal bowel preparation regimen for a suitable colonoscopy should be safe, and well tolerated, and should rapidly clear gastrointestinal tract. Soluble polyethylene glycol (PEG) is the most common cleansing drug and Senna or C-Lax (Cassia angustifolia Vahl) is an alternative herbal one. This study was designed to compare the efficacy of PEG and C-lax in bowel preparation. METHODS In this randomized double blind trial (registry number in IRCT.ir: IRCT201601161264N7), 320 patients were randomly assigned in PEG or C-lax groups. PEG solution was prepared from 5×70 gr sachets in 20×250cc water (250 ml every 15 minutes), prescribed 24h before the colonoscopy. In the other group 3×60 ml C-lax syrup glasses (each containing 90 mg senozid B) was given in two divided doses (1.5 glasses of 250cc every 12 hours), 24h before the colonoscopy. Ottawa score was used to evaluate the quality of bowel preparation. Chi-square test, Student t test, MannWhitney test and multivariate analysis were used to analyze the data. RESULTS Of these patients with the mean (SD) age of 50 (15.16) years, 162 (50.8%) were men. Mean (SD) Ottawa score was 2.57 (0.2) and 3.15 (0.31) in the PEG and C-lax group, respectively (p value = 0.81). Multivariate analysis showed that less opium consumption (p < 0.001) and higher educational level (p =0.005) were associated with better bowel preparation. CONCLUSION C-Lax is non-inferior to PEG solution in cleansing colon. The quality of bowel preparation was lower in opium consumers and better in those with higher educational level.

Indexed as

Bowel preparationC-LaxDouble blind clinical trialOttawa scorePolyethylene glycol

Identifiers

PMID29255579
PMCPMC5726334
OpenAlexW2762994926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.