Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29255486›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels2017

Enhancing methane production from food waste fermentate using biochar: the added value of electrochemical testing in pre-selecting the most effective type of biochar.

Carolina Cruz Viggi, Serena Simonetti, Enza Palma, Pamela Pagliaccia, Camilla Braguglia, Stefano Fazi, Silvia Baronti, Maria Assunta Navarra, Ida Pettiti, Christin Koch and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology for biofuels, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 167 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Effect of organic loading rate on the anaerobic digestion of swine waste with biochar addition.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Clarifying the synergetic effect of magnetite nanoparticles in the methane production process.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Carolina Cruz ViggiWater Research Institute (IRSA), National Research Council (CNR), via Salaria km 29,300, 00015 Monterotondo, Italy.
Serena SimonettiWater Research Institute (IRSA), National Research Council (CNR), via Salaria km 29,300, 00015 Monterotondo, Italy.
Enza PalmaWater Research Institute (IRSA), National Research Council (CNR), via Salaria km 29,300, 00015 Monterotondo, Italy.
Pamela PagliacciaWater Research Institute (IRSA), National Research Council (CNR), via Salaria km 29,300, 00015 Monterotondo, Italy.
Camilla BragugliaWater Research Institute (IRSA), National Research Council (CNR), via Salaria km 29,300, 00015 Monterotondo, Italy.
Stefano FaziWater Research Institute (IRSA), National Research Council (CNR), via Salaria km 29,300, 00015 Monterotondo, Italy.
Silvia BarontiInstitute of Biometeorology (IBIMET), National Research Council (CNR), via G. Caproni 8, 50145 Florence, Italy.
Maria Assunta NavarraDepartment of Chemistry, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 000185 Rome, Italy.
Ida PettitiDepartment of Chemistry, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 000185 Rome, Italy.
Christin KochDepartment of Environmental Microbiology, Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research GmbH-UFZ, Permoserstr. 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany.
Falk HarnischDepartment of Environmental Microbiology, Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research GmbH-UFZ, Permoserstr. 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany.
Federico AulentaWater Research Institute (IRSA), National Research Council (CNR), via Salaria km 29,300, 00015 Monterotondo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6819-7944
Water Research Institute · ITHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research · DESapienza University of Rome · ITIstituto di Biometeorologia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent studies have suggested that addition of electrically conductive biochar particles is an effective strategy to improve the methanogenic conversion of waste organic substrates, by promoting syntrophic associations between acetogenic and methanogenic organisms based on interspecies electron transfer processes. However, the underlying fundamentals of the process are still largely speculative and, therefore, a priori identification, screening, and even design of suitable biochar materials for a given biotechnological process are not yet possible.

resultsHere, three charcoal-like products (i.e., biochars) obtained from the pyrolysis of different lignocellulosic materials, (i.e., wheat bran pellets, coppiced woodlands, and orchard pruning) were tested for their capacity to enhance methane production from a food waste fermentate. In all biochar-supplemented (25 g/L) batch experiments, the complete methanogenic conversion of fermentate volatile fatty acids proceeded at a rate that was up to 5 times higher than that observed in the unamended (or sand-supplemented) controls. Fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis coupled with confocal laser scanning microscopy revealed an intimate association between archaea and bacteria around the biochar particles and provided a clear indication that biochar also shaped the composition of the microbial consortium. Based on the application of a suite of physico-chemical and electrochemical characterization techniques, we demonstrated that the positive effect of biochar is directly related to the electron-donating capacity (EDC) of the material, but is independent of its bulk electrical conductivity and specific surface area. The latter properties were all previously hypothesized to play a major role in the biochar-mediated interspecies electron transfer process in methanogenic consortia.

conclusionsCollectively, these results of this study suggest that for biochar addition in anaerobic digester operation, the screening and identification of the most suitable biochar material should be based on EDC determination, via simple electrochemical tests.

Indexed as

Anaerobic digestionBiocharDirect interspecies electron transfer (DIET)Electron-donating capacity (EDC)Food wasteMethane

Identifiers

PMID29255486
PMCPMC5729428
OpenAlexW2774709181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.