Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29255363›Full record

ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2017

A qualitative study examining methods of accessing and identifying research relevant to clinical practice among rehabilitation clinicians.

Drasti Patel, Christine Koehmstedt, Rebecca Jones, Nathan T Coffey, Xinsheng Cai, Steven Garfinkel, Dahlia M Shaewitz, Ali A Weinstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Access, Utilization, and Implementation of Research Among Rehabilitation Nurses: A Qualitative Study.Rehabilitation nursing : the official journal of the Association of Rehabilitation Nurses
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Drasti PatelCenter for Study of Chronic Illness and Disability, College of Health and Human Services, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.
Christine KoehmstedtCenter for Study of Chronic Illness and Disability, College of Health and Human Services, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.
Rebecca JonesCenter for Study of Chronic Illness and Disability, College of Health and Human Services, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.
Nathan T CoffeyCenter for Study of Chronic Illness and Disability, College of Health and Human Services, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.
Xinsheng CaiAmerican Institutes for Research, Washington, DC, USA.
Steven GarfinkelAmerican Institutes for Research, Washington, DC, USA.
Dahlia M ShaewitzAmerican Institutes for Research, Washington, DC, USA.
Ali A WeinsteinCenter for Study of Chronic Illness and Disability, College of Health and Human Services, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeResearch examining the utilization of evidence-based practice (EBP) specifically among rehabilitation clinicians is limited. The objective of this study was to examine how various rehabilitative clinicians including physical therapists, occupational therapists, rehabilitation counselors, and physiatrists are gaining access to literature and whether they are able to implement the available research into practice.

methodsA total of 21 total clinicians were interviewed via telephone. Using NVivo, a qualitative analysis of the responses was performed.

resultsThere were similarities found with respect to the information-seeking behaviors and translation of research across the different clinician types. Lack of time was reported to be a barrier for both access to literature and implementation of research across all clinician types. The majority of clinicians who reported having difficulty with utilizing the published literature indicated that the literature was not applicable to their practice, the research was not specific enough to be put into practice, or the research found was too outdated to be relevant. In addition, having a supportive work environment aided in the search and utilization of research through providing resources central to assisting clinicians in gaining access to health information.

conclusionOur study identified several barriers that affect EBP for rehabilitation clinicians. The findings suggest the need for researchers to ensure that their work is applicable and specific to clinical practice for implementation to occur.

Indexed as

health informationinformation behaviorknowledge utilizationresearch access

Identifiers

PMID29255363
PMCPMC5722016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.