ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2017
Repeat genetic testing with targeted capture sequencing in primary arrhythmia syndrome and cardiomyopathy.
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genes Associated With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Reappraisal by the ClinGen Hereditary Cardiovascular Disease Gene Curation Expert Panel.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2025Article
- Troponin I - a comprehensive review of its function, structure, evolution, and role in muscle diseases.Animal cells and systems · 2025Review
- ClinGen Hereditary Cardiovascular Disease Gene Curation Expert Panel: Reappraisal of Genes associated with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- A Novel Heterozygous Desmoplakin Variant Causes Cardiocutaneous Syndrome with Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy and Palmoplantar Keratosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Inherited arrhythmia syndrome predisposing to sudden cardiac death.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2021Review
- Whole exome sequencing in a large pedigree with DCM identifies a novel mutation inActa cardiologica · 2020Article
- Patients with unexplained mismatch repair deficiency are interested in updated genetic testing.Hereditary cancer in clinical practice · 2020Article
- Practical Aspects in Genetic Testing for Cardiomyopathies and Channelopathies.The Clinical biochemist. Reviews · 2019Review
- Identification and Functional Characterization of an ISL1 Mutation Predisposing to Dilated Cardiomyopathy.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In inherited primary arrhythmia syndromes (PAS) and cardiomyopathies (CMP), the yield of genetic testing varies between 20 and 75% in different diseases according to studies performed in the pre next-generation sequencing (NGS) era. It is unknown whether retesting historical negative samples with NGS techniques is worthwhile. Therefore, we assessed the value of NGS-based panel testing in previously genotype negative-phenotype positive probands. We selected 107 patients (47 PAS and 60 CMP) with a clear phenotype who remained genotype negative after genetic analysis of the main genes implicated in their specific phenotype. Targeted sequencing of the coding regions of 71 PAS- and CMP-related genes was performed. Variant interpretation and classification was done according to a cardiology-specific scoring algorithm ('Amsterdam criteria') and the ACMG-AMP criteria. Co-segregation analysis was performed when DNA and clinical data of family members were available. Finally, a genetic diagnosis could be established in 21 patients (20%), 5 PAS (11%) and 16 CMP (27%) patients, respectively. The increased detection rate was due to sequencing of novel genes in 52% of the cases and due to technical failures with the historical analysis in 48%. A total of 118 individuals were informed about their carrier state and either reassured or scheduled for proper follow-up. To conclude, genetic retesting in clinically overt PAS and CMP cases, who were genotype negative with older techniques, resulted in an additional genetic diagnosis in up to 20% of the cases. This clearly supports a policy for genetic retesting with NGS-based panels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.