Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29255004›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2018

Prismatic Adaptation Modulates Oscillatory EEG Correlates of Motor Preparation but Not Visual Attention in Healthy Participants.

Martina Bracco, Domenica Veniero, Massimiliano Oliveri, Gregor Thut

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05826626 (Investigating Neurocognitive, Motor and Biological Effects of MindLenses Professional in Neurological Diseases), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05826626 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Investigating Neurocognitive, Motor and Biological Effects of MindLenses Professional in Neurological Diseases

TypeinterventionalSponsorIRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, ItalyRan2021 to 2024Enrolled60ConditionsStroke, Mild Cognitive ImpairmentArmsMindLenses Professional, Conventional rehabilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Visual information potentiates incremental VOR adaptation.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Martina BraccoDipartimento di Scienze Psicologiche, Pedagogiche e della Formazione, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo 90128, Italy, Gregor.Thut@glasgow.ac.uk martina.bracco@unifi.it.
Domenica VenieroCentre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QB, United Kingdom.
Massimiliano OliveriDipartimento di Scienze Psicologiche, Pedagogiche e della Formazione, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo 90128, Italy.
Gregor ThutCentre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QB, United Kingdom Gregor.Thut@glasgow.ac.uk martina.bracco@unifi.it.ORCID 0000-0003-1313-4262
University of Glasgow · GBUniversity of Florence · ITUniversity of Palermo · IT

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prismatic adaption (PA) has been proposed as a tool to induce neural plasticity and is used to help neglect rehabilitation. It leads to a recalibration of visuomotor coordination during pointing as well as to aftereffects on a number of sensorimotor and attention tasks, but whether these effects originate at a motor or attentional level remains a matter of debate. Our aim was to further characterize PA aftereffects by using an approach that allows distinguishing between effects on attentional and motor processes. We recorded EEG in healthy human participants (9 females and 7 males) while performing a new double step, anticipatory attention/motor preparation paradigm before and after adaptation to rightward-shifting prisms, with neutral lenses as a control. We then examined PA aftereffects through changes in known oscillatory EEG signatures of spatial attention orienting and motor preparation in the alpha and beta frequency bands. Our results were twofold. First, we found PA to rightward-shifting prisms to selectively affect EEG signatures of motor but not attentional processes. More specifically, PA modulated preparatory motor EEG activity over central electrodes in the right hemisphere, contralateral to the PA-induced, compensatory leftward shift in pointing movements. No effects were found on EEG signatures of spatial attention orienting over occipitoparietal sites. Second, we found the PA effect on preparatory motor EEG activity to dominate in the beta frequency band. We conclude that changes to intentional visuomotor, rather than attentional visuospatial, processes underlie the PA aftereffect of rightward-deviating prisms in healthy participants.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultAlpha RhythmAnticipation, PsychologicalAttentionBeta RhythmEvoked Potentials, VisualFemaleFigural AftereffectFunctional LateralityHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleOrientationPsychomotor Performanceaftereffectsattention orientingbrain oscillationsEEGmotor preparationprismatic adaptation

Identifiers

PMID29255004
PMCPMC5792477
OpenAlexW2780204065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.