Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29254909›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2017

Direct to Public Peer Support and e-Therapy Program Versus Information to Aid Self-Management of Depression and Anxiety: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Catherine J Kaylor-Hughes, Mat Rawsthorne, Neil S Coulson, Sandra Simpson, Lucy Simons, Boliang Guo, Marilyn James, Paul Moran, Jayne Simpson, Chris Hollis and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05083676 (A Study Protocol on Peer Digital Acceset), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05083676 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Study Protocol on Peer Digital Acceset (PDA): A Randomized Controlled Trial to Translate Online Peer Support for Youth Mental Well-being

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe N.1 Institute for Health (N.1)Ran2022 to 2023Enrolled100ConditionsMental Health IssueArmsAcceset Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Catherine J Kaylor-Hughes *National Institute for Health Research: Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care East Midlands, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3353-4108
Mat Rawsthorne *National Institute for Health Research: Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care East Midlands, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7481-693X
Neil S Coulson *Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9940-909X
Sandra Simpson *Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Institute of Mental Health, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9621-0699
Lucy Simons *National Institute for Health Research: MindTech Healthcare Technology Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, Triumph Road, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8333-3094
Boliang Guo *National Institute for Health Research: Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care East Midlands, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1844-705X
Marilyn James *Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0408-7898
Paul Moran *Centre for Academic Mental Health, School of Social & Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9257-8699
Jayne Simpson *Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Institute of Mental Health, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5105-2634
Chris Hollis *National Institute for Health Research: MindTech Healthcare Technology Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, Triumph Road, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1083-6744
Anthony J Avery *Division of Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7591-4438
Laila J Tata *Division of Epidemiology & Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6404-8658
Laura Williams *National Institute for Health Research: Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care East Midlands, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6296-6677
REBOOT Notts Lived Experience Advisory Panel *National Institute for Health Research: Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care East Midlands, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Richard K Morriss *National Institute for Health Research: Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care East Midlands, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2910-4121
University of Nottingham · GBNottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust · GBNational Institute for Health Research · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRegardless of geography or income, effective help for depression and anxiety only reaches a small proportion of those who might benefit from it. The scale of the problem suggests a role for effective, safe, anonymized public health-driven Web-based services such as Big White Wall (BWW), which offer immediate peer support at low cost.

objectiveUsing Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) methodology, the aim of this study was to determine the population reach, effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and barriers and drivers to implementation of BWW compared with Web-based information compiled by UK's National Health Service (NHS, NHS Choices Moodzone) in people with probable mild to moderate depression and anxiety disorder.

methodsA pragmatic, parallel-group, single-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) is being conducted using a fully automated trial website in which eligible participants are randomized to receive either 6 months access to BWW or signposted to the NHS Moodzone site. The recruitment of 2200 people to the study will be facilitated by a public health engagement campaign involving general marketing and social media, primary care clinical champions, health care staff, large employers, and third sector groups. People will refer themselves to the study and will be eligible if they are older than 16 years, have probable mild to moderate depression or anxiety disorders, and have access to the Internet.

resultsThe primary outcome will be the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale at 6 weeks. We will also explore the reach, maintenance, cost-effectiveness, and barriers and drivers to implementation and possible mechanisms of actions using a range of qualitative and quantitative methods.

conclusionsThis will be the first fully digital trial of a direct to public online peer support program for common mental disorders. The potential advantages of adding this to current NHS mental health services and the challenges of designing a public health campaign and RCT of two digital interventions using a fully automated digital enrollment and data collection process are considered for people with depression and anxiety.

trial registrationInternational Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN): 12673428; http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN12673428/12673428 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6uw6ZJk5a).

Indexed as

anxietydepressiononlinepeer supportself-management

Identifiers

PMID29254909
PMCPMC5748474
OpenAlexW2780466344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.