Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29254460›Full record

ReviewPsychotherapy research : journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research2019

Confessions of a New York rupture researcher: An insider's guide and critique.

J Christopher Muran

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psychotherapy research : journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Renegotiating tasks or goals as rupture repair: A task analysis in a cognitive-behavioral therapy for personality disorder.Psychotherapy research : journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Deepening the Group Training Experience: Group Cohesion and Supervision Impact in Alliance-Focused Training.Group dynamics : theory, research, and practice : the official journal of Division 49, Group Psychology and Group Psychotherapy of the American Psychological Association · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Rupture Resolution Rating System (3RS): Development and validation.Psychotherapy research : journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

J Christopher Murana Gordon F. Derner Institute of Advanced Psychological Studies, Adelphi University , Garden City , NY , USA.

Funding

Resolving Ruptures in Therapeutic AllianceR34MH071768 · NIMH · BETH ISRAEL MEDICAL CTR (NEW YORK) · PI MURAN, JOHN CHRISTOPHER · 2006 to 2008
$681k
NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH071768
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe study of alliance rupture has become quite prevalent since 1990 and especially in the past 10 years where we have seen a noticeable surge in empirical publications on the subject. This honorary paper attempts to provide a critical review of this literature from the perspective of someone who has contributed to it in his collaborative work on a research program designed to investigate ruptures and to develop intervention and training models to resolve them.

methodThis paper is organized into three topics or sections: (1) alliance rupture, (2) rupture resolution, and (3) alliance training; and it addresses definitions, findings, questions, and lessons with regard to each topic. RESULTS/

conclusionsIt suggests some clinical conceptualizations (concerning agency and communion as well as mutual recognition), training implications (regarding emotion regulation and deliberate practice), and methodological considerations (promoting pluralism and contextualism), along with future directions.

Indexed as

Outcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePsychotherapeutic ProcessesTherapeutic AllianceHumansPsychotherapyalliancechange processinterventionrepairresolutionrupturetrainingtreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID29254460
PMCPMC6092258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.