ArticleOncotarget2017
Development and validation of a targeted next generation DNA sequencing panel outperforming whole exome sequencing for the identification of clinically relevant genetic variants.
Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Panels to Pathogen Networks: The Expanding Role of Targeted Sequencing in Veterinary Medicine.Biology · 2025Review
- Article
- Genetic Profiling of Acute and Chronic Leukemia via Next-Generation Sequencing: Current Insights and Future Perspectives.Hematology reports · 2025Review
- What Is Hidden in Patients with Unknown Nephropathy? Genetic Screening Could Be the Missing Link in Kidney Transplantation Diagnosis and Management.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Targeted Sequencing Approach and Its Clinical Applications for the Molecular Diagnosis of Human Diseases.Cells · 2023Review
- Review
- Artificial intelligence and database for NGS-based diagnosis in rare disease.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Review
- Genomic Sub-Classification of Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma Revealed by Distinct Mutational Signatures.Cancers · 2021Article
- Behavioral and Genetic Factors Associated with Successful Long-Term Cessation in Persons with HIV Who Smoke Cigarettes.Journal of smoking cessation · 2021Article
- Utility of a custom designed next generation DNA sequencing gene panel to molecularly classify endometrial cancers according to The Cancer Genome Atlas subgroups.BMC medical genomics · 2020Article
- Comprehensive Custom NGS Panel Validation for the Improvement of the Stratification of B-Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients.Journal of personalized medicine · 2020Article
- Comparison of Large, Medium, and Small Solid Tumor Gene Panels for Detection of Clinically Actionable Mutations in Cancer.Targeted oncology · 2020Article
- Development and validation of a targeted gene sequencing panel for application to disparate cancers.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Empirical design of a variant quality control pipeline for whole genome sequencing data using replicate discordance.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Genetic Variants Associated with FDNY WTC-Related Sarcoidosis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
- Systematic characterization of germline variants from the DiscovEHR study endometrial carcinoma population.BMC medical genomics · 2019Article
- The mutational landscape of recurrent versus nonrecurrent human papillomavirus-related oropharyngeal cancer.JCI insight · 2018Article
- The High-Throughput Analyses Era: Are We Ready for the Data Struggle?High-throughput · 2018Article
- Prevalence of gene mutations in a Chinese 46,XY disorders of sex development cohort detected by targeted next-generation sequencing.Asian journal of andrologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have revolutionized our approach to genomic research. The use of whole genome sequencing (WGS), whole exome sequencing (WES), transcriptome profiling, and targeted DNA sequencing has exponentially improved our understanding of the human genome and the genetic complexities underlying malignancy. Yet, WGS and WES clinical applications remain limited due to high costs and the large volume of data generated. When utilized to address biological questions in basic science studies, targeted sequencing panels have proven extremely valuable due to reduced costs and higher sequencing depth. However, the routine application of targeted sequencing to the clinical setting is limited to a few cancer subtypes. Some highly aggressive tumor types, like type 2 endometrial cancer (EC), could greatly benefit from routine genomic analysis using targeted sequencing. To explore the potential utility of a mid size panel (~150 genes) in the clinical setting, we developed and validated a custom panel against WGS, WES, and another commercially available targeted panel. Our results indicate that a mid size custom designed panel is as efficient as WGS and WES in mapping variants of biological and clinical relevance, rendering higher coverage, at a lower cost, with fewer variants of uncertain significance. Because of the much higher sequencing depth that could be achieved, our results demonstrate that targeted sequencing outperformed WGS and WES in the mapping of pathogenic variants in a breast cancer case, as well as a case of mixed serous and high-grade endometrioid EC, the most aggressive EC subtype.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.