Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29254181›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

Oncological outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multicenter study.

Yuka Kubota, Shingo Hatakeyama, Toshikazu Tanaka, Naoki Fujita, Hiromichi Iwamura, Jotaro Mikami, Hayato Yamamoto, Yuki Tobisawa, Tohru Yoneyama, Takahiro Yoneyama and 7 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma in real-world clinical practice.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. [Urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yuka KubotaDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Shingo HatakeyamaDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Toshikazu TanakaDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Naoki FujitaDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Hiromichi IwamuraDepartment of Urology, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai, Japan.
Jotaro MikamiDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Hayato YamamotoDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Yuki TobisawaDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Tohru YoneyamaDepartment of Advanced Transplant and Regenerative Medicine, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Takahiro YoneyamaDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Yasuhiro HashimotoDepartment of Advanced Transplant and Regenerative Medicine, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Takuya KoieDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Hiroyuki ItoDepartment of Urology, Aomori Rosai Hospital, Hachinohe, Japan.
Kazuaki YoshikawaDepartment of Urology, Mutsu General Hospital, Mutsu, Japan.
Atsushi SasakiDepartment of Urology, Tsugaru General Hospital, Goshogawara, Japan.
Toshiaki KawaguchiDepartment of Urology, Aomori Prefectural Central Hospital, Aomori, Japan.
Chikara OhyamaDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Hirosaki University · JPAomori Prefectural Central Hospital · JPAomori Rosai Hospital · JPTohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe clinical impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) on oncological outcomes in patients with locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) remains unclear. We investigated the oncological outcomes of platinum-based NAC for locally advanced UTUC.

resultsOf 234 patients, 101 received NAC (NAC group) and 133 did not (Control [Ctrl] group). The regimens in the NAC group included gemcitabine and carboplatin (75%), and gemcitabine and cisplatin (21%). Pathological downstagings of the primary tumor and lymphovascular invasion were significantly improved in the NAC than in the Ctrl groups. NAC for locally advanced UTUC significantly prolonged recurrence-free and cancer-specific survival. Multivariate Cox regression analysis using an inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) method showed that NAC was selected as an independent predictor for prolonged recurrence-free and cancer-specific survival. However, the influence of NAC on overall survival was not statistically significant. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 426 patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy at five medical centers between January 1995 and April 2017 were examined retrospectively. Of the 426 patients, 234 were treated for a high-risk disease (stages cT3-4 or locally advanced [cN+] disease) with or without NAC. NAC regimens were selected based on eligibility of cisplatin. We retrospectively evaluated post-therapy pathological downstaging, lymphovascular invasion, and prognosis stratified by NAC use. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed for independent factors for prognosis.

conclusionsPlatinum-based NAC for locally advanced UTUC potentially improves oncological outcomes. Further prospective studies are needed to clarify the clinical benefit of NAC for locally advanced UTUC.

Indexed as

carboplatinchemotherapycisplatinneoadjuvantupper tract urothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID29254181
PMCPMC5731891
OpenAlexW2763573858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.