Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29253440›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Public health2017

Demographic and practice factors predicting repeated non-attendance in primary care: a national retrospective cohort analysis.

David A Ellis, Ross McQueenie, Alex McConnachie, Philip Wilson, Andrea E Williamson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Which patients miss appointments with general practice and the reasons why: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Keeping PeopleInternational journal of social determinants of health and health services · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Prevalence and Drivers of Missed Healthcare Appointments in Poland: Insights From a 2025 Survey.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. On Missed Appointments: The Ethics of Nonattendance in General Practice.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David A EllisDepartment of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Ross McQueenieGeneral Practice and Primary Care, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Alex McConnachieRobertson Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Philip WilsonCentre for Rural Health, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Inverness, UK.
Andrea E WilliamsonDepartment of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK. Electronic address: andrea.williamson@glasgow.ac.uk.

Funding

Chief Scientist Office CZH/4/1118
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAddressing the causes of low engagement in health care is a prerequisite for reducing health inequalities. People who miss multiple appointments are an under-researched group who might have substantial unmet health needs. Individual-level patterns of missed general practice appointments might thus provide a risk marker for vulnerability and poor health outcomes. We sought to ascertain the contributions of patient and practice factors to the likelihood of missing general practice appointments.

methodsFor this national retrospective cohort analysis, we extracted UK National Health Service general practice data that were routinely collected across Scotland between Sept 5, 2013, and Sept 5, 2016. We calculated the per-patient number of missed appointments from individual appointments and investigated the risk of missing a general practice appointment using a negative binomial model offset by number of appointments made. We then analysed the effect of patient-level factors (including age, sex, and socioeconomic status) and practice-level factors (including appointment availability and geographical location) on the risk of missing appointments.

findingsThe full dataset included information from 909 073 patients, of whom 550 083 were included in the analysis after processing. We observed that 104 461 (19·0%) patients missed more than two appointments in the 3 year study period. After controlling for the number of appointments made, patterns of non-attendance could be differentiated, with patients who were aged 16-30 years (relative risk ratio [RRR] 1·21, 95% CI 1·19-1·23) or older than 90 years (2·20, 2·09-2·29), and of low socioeconomic status (Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation decile 1: RRR 2·27, 2·22-2·31) significantly more likely to miss multiple appointments. Men missed fewer appointments overall than women, but were somewhat more likely to miss appointments in the adjusted model (1·05, 1·04-1·06). Practice factors also substantially affected attendance patterns, with urban practices in affluent areas that typically have appointment waiting times of 2-3 days the most likely to have patients who serially miss appointments. The combination of both patient and practice factors to predict appointments missed gave a higher pseudo R

interpretationThe findings that both patient and practice characteristics contribute to non-attendance of general practice appointments raise important questions for both the management of patients who miss multiple appointments and the effectiveness of existing strategies that aim to increase attendance. Addressing these issues should lead to improvements in provision of services and public health.

fundingScottish Government Chief Scientist Office and Data Sharing and Linkage Service of the Scottish Government.

Indexed as

Appointments and SchedulesGeneral PracticeAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID29253440
PMCPMC5725414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.