Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29253169›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2018

A value set for documenting adverse reactions in electronic health records.

Foster R Goss, Kenneth H Lai, Maxim Topaz, Warren W Acker, Leigh Kowalski, Joseph M Plasek, Kimberly G Blumenthal, Diane L Seger, Sarah P Slight, Kin Wah Fung and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Building an allergy reconciliation module to eliminate allergy discrepancies in electronic health records.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Clinical decision support malfunctions related to medication routes: a case series.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Vancomycin Hypersensitivity Reactions Documented in Electronic Health Records.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2021
    Article
  17. A dynamic reaction picklist for improving allergy reaction documentation in the electronic health record.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Advances in drug allergy, urticaria, angioedema, and anaphylaxis in 2018.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2019
    Review
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Foster R GossDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Kenneth H LaiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Maxim TopazDivision of General Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Warren W AckerDivision of General Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Leigh KowalskiDivision of General Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Joseph M PlasekDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Kimberly G BlumenthalDivision of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, and Medical Practice Evaluation Center, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Diane L SegerClinical and Quality Analysis, Partners HealthCare System, Boston, MA, USA.
Sarah P SlightDivision of General Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Kin Wah FungNational Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Frank Y ChangClinical and Quality Analysis, Partners HealthCare System, Boston, MA, USA.
David W BatesDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Li ZhouDivision of General Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Encoding and Processing Patient Allergy Information in EHRsR01HS022728 · AHRQ · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI ZHOU, LI · 2013 to 2016
$2.0M
Clinical and Informatics Research in Medical TerminologiesZIALM010013 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI FUNG, KIN WAH · 2018 to 2020
$1.6M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS022728
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To develop a comprehensive value set for documenting and encoding adverse reactions in the allergy module of an electronic health record. Materials and Methods: We analyzed 2 471 004 adverse reactions stored in Partners Healthcare's Enterprise-wide Allergy Repository (PEAR) of 2.7 million patients. Using the Medical Text Extraction, Reasoning, and Mapping System, we processed both structured and free-text reaction entries and mapped them to Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine - Clinical Terms. We calculated the frequencies of reaction concepts, including rare, severe, and hypersensitivity reactions. We compared PEAR concepts to a Federal Health Information Modeling and Standards value set and University of Nebraska Medical Center data, and then created an integrated value set. Results: We identified 787 reaction concepts in PEAR. Frequently reported reactions included: rash (14.0%), hives (8.2%), gastrointestinal irritation (5.5%), itching (3.2%), and anaphylaxis (2.5%). We identified an additional 320 concepts from Federal Health Information Modeling and Standards and the University of Nebraska Medical Center to resolve gaps due to missing and partial matches when comparing these external resources to PEAR. This yielded 1106 concepts in our final integrated value set. The presence of rare, severe, and hypersensitivity reactions was limited in both external datasets. Hypersensitivity reactions represented roughly 20% of the reactions within our data. Discussion: We developed a value set for encoding adverse reactions using a large dataset from one health system, enriched by reactions from 2 large external resources. This integrated value set includes clinically important severe and hypersensitivity reactions. Conclusion: This work contributes a value set, harmonized with existing data, to improve the consistency and accuracy of reaction documentation in electronic health records, providing the necessary building blocks for more intelligent clinical decision support for allergies and adverse reactions.

Indexed as

Drug HypersensitivityDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsElectronic Health RecordsVocabulary, ControlledDatasets as TopicDocumentationHumansNatural Language ProcessingSystematized Nomenclature of Medicine

Identifiers

PMID29253169
PMCPMC6251510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.