Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29252901›Full record

ArticleOptometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry2018

Mechanisms of Image Stabilization in Central Vision Loss: Smooth Pursuit.

Esther G González, Luminita Tarita-Nistor, Efrem Mandelcorn, Mark Mandelcorn, Martin J Steinbach

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. How People With Vision Impairment Use Their Gaze to Hit a Ball.Translational vision science & technology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Eye Movements in Macular Degeneration.Annual review of vision science · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Esther G GonzálezKrembil Research Institute, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Luminita Tarita-NistorKrembil Research Institute, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Efrem MandelcornDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Canada.
Mark MandelcornDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Canada.
Martin J SteinbachKrembil Research Institute, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
University of Toronto · CAToronto Western Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

significanceIn addition to understanding the adaptive mechanisms of eccentric viewing during smooth pursuit, the ocular motor adaptations of patients with central vision loss give us a better understanding of the basic mechanisms of smooth pursuit in the healthy visual system. PURPOSE: For patients with age-related macular degeneration and controls with normal vision, we examined the closed-loop gain of horizontal and vertical smooth pursuit eye movements as a function of stimulus speed and direction. We hypothesized that pursuit gain functions would be affected by stimulus speed and the location of the preferred retinal locus (PRL) in relation to the scotoma as determined by a fixation stability task using a microperimeter. Specifically, that a PRL on the left of the scotoma in the visual field would decrease the rightward gain relative to the leftward gain and a PRL below the scotoma in the visual field would decrease the upward gain.

methodsTen patients and 15 controls were tested in a step-ramp procedure with direction (left/right for horizontal motion; up/down for vertical motion), speed (5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 deg/s), and five replication conditions randomized and blocked by orientation (horizontal vs. vertical).

resultsHorizontal pursuit had a higher gain than vertical pursuit. The two eyes of the patients moved conjugately with similar smooth pursuit gains. For horizontal pursuit, all patients, regardless of PRL location, showed significantly better pursuit of leftward motion. For vertical pursuit, downward pursuit had a higher gain than upward pursuit for most patients.

conclusionsPRL location was not predictive of the directional preponderance of pursuit performance. These results imply that patients may not use the PRL that was initially found during a static fixation task; they may adapt to the task by using a PRL that appears more suitable.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMacular DegenerationMaleMiddle AgedPursuit, SmoothRetinaScotomaVisual FieldsVisual Field Tests

Identifiers

PMID29252901
OpenAlexW2774786020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.