Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29252610›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine2019

Reliability and performance of the Swiss Emergency Triage Scale used by paramedics.

Olivier Grosgurin, Angèle Gayet-Ageron, Laurent Suppan, Josette Simon, Adolfo Villar, Véronique Trombert, Christophe Marti, François P Sarasin, Olivier T Rutschmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. An inter-rater reliability study of a modified version of SATS as a prehospital triage tool.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Olivier GrosgurinDepartment of Community, Primary Care and Emergency Medicine, Division of Emergency Medicine.
Angèle Gayet-AgeronDepartment of Epidemiology.
Laurent SuppanDepartment of Community, Primary Care and Emergency Medicine, Division of Emergency Medicine.
Josette SimonDepartment of Community, Primary Care and Emergency Medicine, Division of Emergency Medicine.
Adolfo VillarDepartment of Community, Primary Care and Emergency Medicine, Division of Emergency Medicine.
Véronique TrombertDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Rehabilitation, and Geriatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Christophe MartiDepartment of Community, Primary Care and Emergency Medicine, Division of Emergency Medicine.
François P SarasinDepartment of Community, Primary Care and Emergency Medicine, Division of Emergency Medicine.
Olivier T RutschmannDepartment of Community, Primary Care and Emergency Medicine, Division of Emergency Medicine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesNo general emergency department triage scale has been evaluated for prehospital triage. The objective of this study was to evaluate the reliability and the performance of the Swiss Emergency Triage Scale (SETS) used by paramedics to determine the emergency level and orientation of simulated patients. PATIENTS AND

methodsIn a prospective cross-sectional study, 23 paramedics evaluated 28 clinical scenarios with the SETS using interactive computerized triage software simulating real-life triage. The primary outcome was inter-rater reliability regarding the triage level among participants measured by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Secondary outcomes were the accuracy of triage level and the reliability and accuracy of orientation of patients of at least 75 years to a dedicated geriatric emergency centre.

resultsTwenty-three paramedics completed the evaluation of the 28 scenarios (644 triage decisions). Overall, ICC for triage level was 0.84 (95% confidence interval: 0.77-0.99). Correct emergency level was assigned in 89% of cases, overtriage rate was 4.8%, and undertriage was 6.2%. ICC regarding orientation in the subgroup of simulated patients of at least 75 years was 0.76 (95% confidence interval: 0.61-0.89), with 93% correct orientation.

conclusionReliability of paramedics rating simulated emergency situations using the SETS was excellent, and the accuracy of their rating was very high. This suggests that in Switzerland, the SETS could be safely used in the prehospital setting by paramedics to determine the level of emergency and guide patients to the most appropriate hospital.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceAgedAllied Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesEmergency Medical ServicesFemaleHumansMaleObserver VariationProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsSimulation TrainingSwitzerlandTriage

Identifiers

PMID29252610
PMCPMC6504125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.