Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29251915›Full record

ReviewChemical reviews2018

Beyond Transcription: Roles of Transcription Factors in Pre-mRNA Splicing.

Xavier Rambout, Franck Dequiedt, Lynne E Maquat

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Promoter Specificity and Transcription Levels ModulateInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Brain-Specific Gata4 Downregulation in Greywick Female Mice Models the Metabolic Subtype of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

University of Rochester · USUniversity of Liège · BE

Funding

REGULATION OF SELENOPROTEIN RNA METABOLISMR01GM059614 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI MAQUAT, LYNNE E · 1999 to 2022
$9.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM059614
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whereas individual steps of protein-coding gene expression in eukaryotes can be studied in isolation in vitro, it has become clear that these steps are intimately connected within cells. Connections not only ensure quality control but also fine-tune the gene expression process, which must adapt to environmental changes while remaining robust. In this review, we systematically present proven and potential mechanisms by which sequence-specific DNA-binding transcription factors can alter gene expression beyond transcription initiation and regulate pre-mRNA splicing, and thereby mRNA isoform production, by (i) influencing transcription elongation rates, (ii) binding to pre-mRNA to recruit splicing factors, and/or (iii) blocking the association of splicing factors with pre-mRNA. We propose various mechanistic models throughout the review, in some cases without explicit supportive evidence, in hopes of providing fertile ground for future studies.

Indexed as

Transcription, GeneticDNAPromoter Regions, GeneticProtein BindingRNA, MessengerRNA Polymerase IIRNA PrecursorsRNA SplicingTranscription FactorsDNARNA, MessengerRNA Polymerase IIRNA PrecursorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID29251915
PMCPMC6734189
OpenAlexW2778379514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.