Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29251498›Full record

ReviewACS chemical biology2018

Protein Inhibitors of CRISPR-Cas9.

Joseph Bondy-Denomy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS chemical biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. AcrDB update: Predicted 3D structures of anti-CRISPRs in human gut viromes.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Crystal structure of the anti-CRISPR, AcrIIC4.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2021
    Article
  13. CRISPR Element Patterns vs. Pathoadaptability of ClinicalAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  14. Single-Base Resolution: Increasing the Specificity of the CRISPR-Cas System in Gene Editing.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Joseph Bondy-DenomyDepartment of Microbiology & Immunology, Quantitative Biosciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco , San Francisco, California 94143, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4909-9481

Funding

Discovering New Roles for CRISPR-Cas in Bacterial PathogenesisDP5OD021344 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BONDY-DENOMY, JOSEPH · 2015 to 2019
$2.1M
NIH HHS DP5 OD021344
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteria are under constant predation from viruses, called bacteriophages (phages). This threat has driven the evolution of multiple defense systems, including the CRISPR-Cas (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats and CRISPR associated genes) immune pathway. Phages are not passive bystanders in their CRISPR-mediated demise, however, as many have developed potent protein inhibitors of the bacterial adaptive immune system. Here, I review the work that led to the discovery of many distinct "anti-CRISPR" proteins. Furthermore, I outline how understanding their mechanisms of action has provided a suite of specific and high-affinity reagents to modulate and study CRISPR-Cas applications.

Indexed as

BacteriaBacteriophagesClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsCRISPR-Associated Protein 9CRISPR-Associated ProteinsCRISPR-Cas SystemsDNAGene EditingHumansProtein BindingStreptococcus pyogenesViral ProteinsCas9 endonuclease Streptococcus pyogenesCRISPR-Associated Protein 9CRISPR-Associated ProteinsDNAViral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID29251498
PMCPMC6049822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.