Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29251384›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2018

Aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase-to-platelet ratio outweigh fibrosis index based on four factors and red cell distribution width-platelet ratio in diagnosing liver fibrosis and inflammation in chronic hepatitis B.

Xiaojuan Wu, Bei Cai, Zhenzhen Su, Yamei Li, Jin Xu, Rong Deng, Lanlan Wang

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Performance of common imaging techniquesWorld journal of clinical cases · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiaojuan WuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine/Research Center of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9199-4140
Bei CaiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine/Research Center of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Zhenzhen SuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine/Research Center of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Yamei LiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine/Research Center of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Jin XuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine/Research Center of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Rong DengDepartment of Infectious Disease Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Lanlan WangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine/Research Center of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe benefits of using serum markers to diagnose stages of liver disease in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients are controversial. We conducted a study to compare the clinical significance of four markers in evaluating liver inflammation and fibrosis in CHB patients.

methodsA total of 323 treatment-naive CHB patients who received a liver biopsy and routine laboratory testing were enrolled in our study. We used the Scheuer scoring system as a pathological standard for diagnosing liver inflammation and fibrosis. The diagnostic performance of the fibrosis index based on four factors (FIB-4), the aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index (APRI), the gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase-to-platelet ratio (GPR), and the red cell distribution width-platelet ratio (RPR) were analyzed with receiver-operating characteristic curves (ROC).

resultsNo significant differences among the four indexes for diagnosing significant fibrosis (S ≥ 2) was found, while APRI and GPR were superior to FIB-4 and RPR in diagnosing moderate (G ≥ 2), severe (G ≥ 3) inflammation, and severe fibrosis (S ≥ 3). The AUROCs for diagnosing G ≥ 2 and G ≥ 3 were 0.732 and 0.861 for APRI, 0.726 and0.883 for GPR, 0.703 and0.705 for FIB-4, and 0.660 and 0.747 for RPR, respectively. The AUROCs for diagnosing S ≥ 2 and S ≥ 3 were0.724 and 0.799 for APRI, 0.714 and0.801 for GPR, 0.683 and0.730 for FIB-4, and 0.643 and 0.705 for RPR, respectively.

conclusionAPRI and GPR were more effective than FIB-4 and RPR at diagnosing liver inflammation and fibrosis.

Indexed as

Hepatitis B, ChronicLiver CirrhosisAdultAspartate AminotransferasesBiomarkersBiopsyBlood PlateletsErythrocyte IndicesFemalegamma-GlutamyltransferaseHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesROC CurveAspartate AminotransferasesBiomarkersgamma-Glutamyltransferasechronic hepatitis Blaboratory testliver fibrosisliver inflammationnoninvasive

Identifiers

PMID29251384
PMCPMC6816941
OpenAlexW2776251179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.