ArticleStatistics in medicine2019
Innovative modeling of naturalistic driving data: Inference and prediction.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pattern Mining of Older Drivers' Driving Behavior Through Telematics-data-driven Unsupervised Learning.IEEE sensors journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Naturalistic driving studies provide opportunities for investigating the effects of key driving exposures on risky driving performance and accidents. New technology provides a realistic assessment of risky driving through the intensive monitoring of kinematic behavior while driving. These studies with their complex data structures provide opportunities for statisticians to develop needed modeling techniques for statistical inference. This article discusses new statistical modeling procedures that were developed to specifically answer important analytical questions for naturalistic driving studies. However, these methodologies also have important applications for the analysis of intensively collected longitudinal data, an increasingly common data structure with the advent of wearable devises. To examine the sources of variation between- and within-participants in risky driving behavior, we explore the use of generalized linear mixed models with autoregressive random processes to analyzing long sequences of kinematic count data from a group of teenagers that have measurements at each trip over a 1.5-year observation period starting after receiving their license. These models provide a regression framework for examining the effects of driving conditions and exposures on risky driving behavior. Alternatively, generalized estimating equations approaches are explored for the situation where we have intensively collected count measurements on a moderate number of participants. In addition to proposing statistical modeling for kinematic events, we explore models for relating kinematic events with crash risk. Specifically, we propose both latent variable and hidden Markov models for relating these 2 processes and for developing dynamic predictors of crash risk from longitudinal kinematic event data. These different statistical modeling techniques are all used to analyze data from the Naturalistic Teenage Driving Study, a unique investigation into how teenagers drive after licensure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.