Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29250734›Full record

ArticleMicrobial ecology2018

Acquisition of Uropygial Gland Microbiome by Hoopoe Nestlings.

Manuel Martín-Vivaldi, Juan José Soler, Ángela Martínez-García, Laura Arco, Natalia Juárez-García-Pelayo, Magdalena Ruiz-Rodríguez, Manuel Martínez-Bueno

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial ecology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Great Tit (Frontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Manuel Martín-VivaldiDepartamento de Zoología, Universidad de Granada, 18071, Granada, Spain. mmv@ugr.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5432-425X
Juan José SolerEstación Experimental de Zonas Áridas (CSIC), 04120, Almería, Spain.
Ángela Martínez-GarcíaEstación Experimental de Zonas Áridas (CSIC), 04120, Almería, Spain.
Laura ArcoDepartamento de Zoología, Universidad de Granada, 18071, Granada, Spain.
Natalia Juárez-García-PelayoDepartamento de Zoología, Universidad de Granada, 18071, Granada, Spain.
Magdalena Ruiz-RodríguezEstación Experimental de Zonas Áridas (CSIC), 04120, Almería, Spain.
Manuel Martínez-BuenoDepartamento de Microbiología, Universidad de Granada, 18071, Granada, Spain.
Universidad de Granada · ESEstacion Experimental de Zonas Aridas · ES

Funding

ANTIPROLIFERATIVE OF INTERFERON ON BREAST CANCER CELLSR01CA048193 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI HAMBURGER, ANNE W · 1988 to 1990
–
Agencia de Innovación y Desarrollo de Andalucía P09-RNM-4557Agencia de Innovación y Desarrollo de Andalucía Predoctoral grant P09-RNM-4557Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación CGL2009-14006Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación CGL2010-19233-C03-01Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación CGL2010-19233-C03-03Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación CGL2013-48193-C3-1-PMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación CGL2013-48193-C3-2-P
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutualistic symbioses between animals and bacteria depend on acquisition of appropriate symbionts while avoiding exploitation by non-beneficial microbes. The mode of acquisition of symbionts would determine, not only the probability of encountering but also evolutionary outcomes of mutualistic counterparts. The microbiome inhabiting the uropygial gland of the European hoopoe (Upupa epops) includes a variety of bacterial strains, some of them providing antimicrobial benefits. Here, the mode of acquisition and stability of this microbiome is analyzed by means of Automated rRNA Intergenic Spacer Analysis and two different experiments. The first experiment impeded mothers' access to their glands, thus avoiding direct transmission of microorganisms from female to offspring secretions. The second experiment explored the stability of the microbiomes by inoculating glands with secretions from alien nests. The first experiment provoked a reduction in similarity of microbiomes of mother and nestlings. Interestingly, some bacterial strains were more often detected when females had not access to their glands, suggesting antagonistic effects among bacteria from different sources. The second experiment caused an increase in richness of the microbiome of receivers in terms of prevalence of Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) that reduced differences in microbiomes of donors and receivers. That occurred because OTUs that were present in donors but not in receivers incorporated to the microbiome of the latter, which provoked that cross-inoculated nestlings got similar final microbiomes that included the most prevalent OTUs. The results are therefore consistent with a central role of vertical transmission in bacterial acquisition by nestling hoopoes and support the idea that the typical composition of the hoopoe gland microbiome is reached by the incorporation of some bacteria during the nestling period. This scenario suggests the existence of a coevolved core microbiome composed by a mix of specialized vertically transmitted strains and facultative symbionts able to coexist with them. The implications of this mixed mode of transmission for the evolution of the mutualism are discussed.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacteriaBacterial LoadBacterial Physiological PhenomenaBiodiversityBiological CoevolutionBirdsDNA, BacterialExocrine GlandsFemaleMicrobiotaMolecular TypingNesting BehaviorPhylogenySpainSymbiosisDNA, BacterialBy-product cooperationCoevolutionMutualismPreen glandSymbiotic bacteria

Identifiers

PMID29250734
OpenAlexW2774743958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.