ArticleEndoscopy international open2017
Endoscopic full-thickness resection for T1 early rectal cancer: a case series and video report.
Article in Endoscopy international open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Endoscopic full-thickness resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Risk of recurrence after local resection of T1 rectal cancer: a meta-analysis with meta-regression.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Pooled it
- Real-world topographical efficacy, procedural outcome and safety of endoscopic full thickness resection in colon segments.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Article
- Outcomes of endoscopic full thickness resection in the colon rectum at an Italian tertiary center.Techniques in coloproctology · 2023Review
- A large multicenter cohort on the use of full-thickness resection device for difficult colonic lesions.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Over-the-scope clip-assisted endoscopic full thickness resection: a video-based case series.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Article
- Endoscopic full-thickness resection using a clip non-exposed method for gastrointestinal tract lesions: a meta-analysis.Endoscopy international open · 2020Article
- Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) in the lower gastrointestinal tract.Techniques in coloproctology · 2019Article
- Hybrid endoscopic approaches for complex colorectal polyps with a non-lifting sign: the Greek experience.Annals of gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY
aimsEndoscopic treatment of malignant colorectal polyps is often challenging, especially for early rectal cancer (ERC) localized close to the dentate line. Conversely, the surgical approach may result in temporary or definitive stoma and in frequent post-surgical complications. The Full-Thickness Resection Device (FTRD PATIENTS AND
methodsSix consecutive patients with incomplete endoscopic resection of T1-ERC were treated with the FTRD and their long-term outcomes were evaluated based on a detailed clinical and instrumental assessment.
resultsThe endoscopic en bloc full-thickness resection was technically feasible in all patients. The histopathologic analysis showed a complete endoscopic resection in all cases, and a full-thickness excision in four. Neither complications, nor disease recurrence were observed during the 1-year follow-up period.
conclusionsThe FTRD System is a promising tool for treating ERC featuring a residual risk of disease recurrence after incomplete endoscopic mucosal resection in patients unfit for surgery or refusing a surgical approach.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.