ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2018
Estimating detectability index
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nonprewhitening model observers in the Fourier and spatial domain: a comparison of predictions for iterative and deep learning reconstruction in computed tomography.Radiation protection dosimetry · 2026Article
- Development of a customizable model for spectral photon-counting detector CT.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Objective assessment of diagnostic image quality in CT scans: what radiologists and researchers need to know.Insights into imaging · 2025Review
- Preserving noise texture through training data curation for deep learning denoising of high-resolution cardiac EID-CT.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Patient-specific Channelized Hotelling observer to estimate lesion detectability in CT.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2025Article
- Intra- and inter-scanner CT variability and their impact on diagnostic tasks.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2025Article
- Optimization of abdominal CT based on a model of total risk minimization by putting radiation risk in perspective with imaging benefit.Communications medicine · 2024Article
- Standardization of scan protocols for RT CT simulator from different vendors using quantitative image quality technique.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Article
- Photon-counting computed tomography versus energy-integrating computed tomography for detection of small liver lesions: comparison using a virtual framework imaging.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2024Article
- Oncology-specific radiation dose and image noise reference levels in adult abdominal-pelvic CT.Clinical imaging · 2023Article
- Article
- Science and practice of imaging physics through 50 years of SPIE Medical Imaging conferences.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2022Article
- Virtual monoenergetic images from dual-energy CT: systematic assessment of task-based image quality performance.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022Article
- Development, validation, and relevance of in vivo low-contrast task transfer function to estimate detectability in clinical CT images.Medical physics · 2021Article
- Assessment of the global noise algorithm for automatic noise measurement in head CT examinations.Medical physics · 2021Article
- Variability in image quality and radiation dose within and across 97 medical facilities.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2021Article
- Clinical concordance with Image Gently guidelines for pediatric computed tomography: a study across 663,417 CT scans at 53 clinical facilities.Pediatric radiology · 2021Article
- Evaluation of low-contrast detectability for iterative reconstruction in pediatric abdominal computed tomography: a phantom study.Pediatric radiology · 2020Article
- Detection of Colorectal Hepatic Metastases Is Superior at Standard Radiation Dose CT versus Reduced Dose CT.Radiology · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study's purpose was to develop and validate a method to estimate patient-specific detectability indices directly from patients' CT images (i.e.,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.