Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29250336›Full record

ReviewJournal of hip preservation surgery2017

Preoperative planning for redirective, periacetabular osteotomies.

Christoph E Albers, Piet Rogers, Nicholas Wambeek, Sufian S Ahmad, Piers J Yates, Gareth H Prosser

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of hip preservation surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Ambiguity of Names and Landmarks in Radiographs of the Pediatric Pelvis: Variations and a Historical Perspective.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Narrative Review on the Role of Imaging in DDH.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Assessment of three-dimensional acetabular coverage angles.Journal of hip preservation surgery · 2020
    Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christoph E AlbersDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Fremantle and Fiona Stanley Hospitals, 11 Robin Warren Dr, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia.
Piet RogersDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Fremantle and Fiona Stanley Hospitals, 11 Robin Warren Dr, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia.
Nicholas WambeekDepartment of Radiology, Fremantle and Fiona Stanley Hospitals, 11 Robin Warren Dr, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia.
Sufian S AhmadDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Bern, Freiburgstr. 4, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.
Piers J YatesDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Fremantle and Fiona Stanley Hospitals, 11 Robin Warren Dr, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia.
Gareth H ProsserDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Fremantle and Fiona Stanley Hospitals, 11 Robin Warren Dr, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Redirective, periacetabular osteotomies (PAO) represent a group of surgical procedures for treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in skeletally mature and immature patients. The ultimate goal of all procedures is to reduce symptoms, improve function and delay or prevent progression of osteoarthritis. During the last two decades, the understanding of the underlying pathomechanisms has continuously evolved. This is mainly attributable to the development of the femoroacetabular impingement concept that has increased the awareness of the underlying three-dimensional complexity associated with DDH. With increasing knowledge about the pathobiomechanics of dysplastic hips, diagnostic tools have improved allowing for sophisticated preoperative analyses of the morphological and pathobiomechanical features, and early recognition of degenerative changes, which may alter the long-term outcome. As redirective, PAO are technically demanding procedures, preoperative planning is crucial to avoid intraoperative obstacles and to sufficiently address the patient-specific deformity. Although conventional radiography has been used for decades, it has not lost its primary role in the diagnostic work-up of patients with DDH. Furthermore, an increasing number of modern imaging techniques exists allowing for assessment of early cartilage degeneration (biochemical magnetic resonance imaging) as well as 3D planning and computer-based virtual treatment simulation of PAO. This article reviews the literature with regard to the current concepts of imaging of DDH, preoperative planning and treatment recommendations for redirective, PAO.

Identifiers

PMID29250336
PMCPMC5721378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.