ArticleMedChemComm2017
Bitopic fluorescent antagonists of the A
Article in MedChemComm, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cannabidiol negatively modulates adenosine AActa neuropsychiatrica · 2024Article
- Novel Quinazoline Derivatives as Highly Effective A2A Adenosine Receptor Antagonists.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Fluorescent APurinergic signalling · 2023Article
- Adenosine AInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Molecular probes for the human adenosine receptors.Purinergic signalling · 2021Review
- Allosteric Antagonism of the ACells · 2020Article
- Adenosine ACells · 2019Article
- Activation of adenosine ANeuropharmacology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A pyrazolo[4,3-
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.