ReviewJournal of atrial fibrillation
The Role of Implantable Cardiac Monitors in Atrial Fibrillation Management.
Review in Journal of atrial fibrillation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Atrial Fibrillation Burden: Assessment, Clinical Significance, and Therapeutic Implications.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Expanding the Role of Implantable Loop Recorders: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Yields Across Seven Clinical Indications in 388 Real-World Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Comparison of Electrocardiogram Characteristics of Two Commercially Available Implantable Loop Monitors: Impact of These Characteristics in the Correct Adjudication of Recorded Events and Minimized Undersensing and Oversensing of Events.The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management · 2025Article
- Review
- Diagnostic yield of an insertable cardiac monitor in a large patient population.Heart rhythm O2 · 2023Article
- Insertable cardiac monitor with a long sensing vector: Impact of obesity on sensing quality and safety.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Programming Optimization in Implantable Cardiac Monitors to Reduce False-Positive Arrhythmia Alerts: A Call for Research.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- R-wave amplitude changes with posture and physical activity over time in an insertable cardiac monitor.Cardiovascular digital health journal · 2022Article
- Use of a smartphone electrocardiogram to diagnose arrhythmias during exercise in athletes: a case series.European heart journal. Case reports · 2022Article
- New-generation miniaturized insertable cardiac monitor with a long sensing vector: Insertion procedure, sensing performance, and home monitoring transmission success in a real-world population.Heart rhythm O2 · 2022Article
- Factors affecting signal quality in implantable cardiac monitors with long sensing vector.Journal of arrhythmia · 2021Article
- Over- and undersensing-pitfalls of arrhythmia detection with implantable devices and wearables.Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2020Review
- Wireless Endocardial Atrial (and Ventricular) Sensing with no Implanted Power Source: a Proposal.Journal of medical systems · 2019Article
- Implantable loop recorder in clinical practice.Journal of arrhythmia · 2019Review
- Noninvasive Assessment of Atrial Fibrillation Complexity in Relation to Ablation Characteristics and Outcome.Frontiers in physiology · 2018Article
- Subcutaneouscardiac Rhythm Monitors: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of atrial fibrillationReview
- Global shifts in ischemic stroke research: Evolving focus on management, risk factors, and national contributions (2012-2022).Brain circulationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Continuous heart rhythm monitoring using implantable cardiac monitors (ICMs) for atrial fibrillation (AF) management is steadily increasing in current clinical practice, even in the absence of an established indication provided by international guidelines. The increasing use of such devices is mainly associated with recent technological improvements including miniaturization, easier implant procedures, and remote monitoring, all of which make this strategy continuously more appealing and promising. For these and other reasons, ICMs have been proven to be a safe and highly effective tool for detecting AF episodes. However, ICMs are not the best option for every patient, as limitations exist. Therefore, it is imperative to weigh the possible benefits against the potential limitations of using these devices when deciding individualized patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.