ArticleThe annals of applied statistics2017
Quantification of Multiple Tumor Clones Using Gene Array and Sequencing Data.
Article in The annals of applied statistics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A hidden Markov modeling approach for identifying tumor subclones in next-generation sequencing studies.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Characterizing allele- and haplotype-specific copy numbers in single cells with CHISEL.Nature biotechnology · 2021Article
- Intratumor heterogeneity index of breast carcinomas based on DNA methylation profiles.BMC cancer · 2019Article
- Identifying disease-associated copy number variations by a doubly penalized regression model.Biometrics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cancer development is driven by genomic alterations, including copy number aberrations. The detection of copy number aberrations in tumor cells is often complicated by possible contamination of normal stromal cells in tumor samples and intratumor heterogeneity, namely the presence of multiple clones of tumor cells. In order to correctly quantify copy number aberrations, it is critical to successfully de-convolute the complex structure of the genetic information from tumor samples. In this article, we propose a general Bayesian method for estimating copy number aberrations when there are normal cells and potentially more than one tumor clones. Our method provides posterior probabilities for the proportions of tumor clones and normal cells. We incorporate prior information on the distribution of the copy numbers to prioritize biologically more plausible solutions and alleviate possible identifiability issues that have been observed by many researchers. Our model is flexible and can work for both SNP array and next-generation sequencing data. We compare our method to existing ones and illustrate the advantage of our approach in multiple datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.