Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29250155›Full record

ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2018

Correlation of diffusion tensor imaging parameters and Gleason scores of prostate cancer.

Weizhong Tian, Ji Zhang, Fangzheng Tian, Junkang Shen, Tianli Niu, Guohua He, Hong Yu

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Imaging in translational cancer research.Cancer biology & medicine · 2022
    Review
  6. Clinical application and progress of quantitative functional magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Weizhong TianDepartment of Radiology, Taizhou People's Hospital, Taizhou, Jiangsu 225300, P.R. China.
Ji ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Taizhou People's Hospital, Taizhou, Jiangsu 225300, P.R. China.
Fangzheng TianDepartment of Radiology, Taizhou People's Hospital, Taizhou, Jiangsu 225300, P.R. China.
Junkang ShenDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215004, P.R. China.
Tianli NiuDepartment of Urinary Surgery, Taizhou People's Hospital, Taizhou, Jiangsu 225300, P.R. China.
Guohua HeDepartment of Urinary Surgery, Taizhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Taizhou, Jiangsu 225300, P.R. China.
Hong YuDepartment of Pathology, Taizhou People's Hospital, Taizhou, Jiangsu 225300, P.R. China.
Taizhou People's Hospital · CNNantong University · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to explore the association between the parameters of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), including fractional anisotropy (FA) values, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and the diffusion tensor tractography (DTT) map, with the Gleason score of prostate cancer (PCa). A retrospective study of 50 cases of PCa confirmed by biopsy or surgical pathology was performed. Conventional magnetic resonance imaging and DTI scans were conducted in these cases. The 50 cases of PCa were divided into three groups, including low, intermediate and high grade, according to the Gleason score. Post-DTI processing was performed using Neuro 3D software, in order to measure the FA and ADC values, and map the prostate fibers. Differences in FA and ADC values among the various PCa groups were examined using analysis of variance, while the correlation of FA and ADC values with the Gleason score was studied using Pearson correlation analysis. The obtained DTT map clearly demonstrated the spatial structure of the prostate fibers. The fibers of the cancer area were dense without interruption in the low-grade group, sparse and disordered in the intermediate-grade group, and were disordered, sparse or even absent in the high-grade group. The FA values were 0.284±0.313, 0.293±0.347 and 0.369±0.347, respectively, with statistically significant differences observed among the three groups (F=234.533; P<0.05) and between each group (P<0.05). In addition, the FA value of PCa was positively correlated with the Gleason score (r=0.884; P<0.05). The ADC values of the low-, intermediate- and high-grade groups were 1.070±0.072×10

Indexed as

apparent diffusion coefficientdiffusion tensor imagingdiffusion tensor tractographyfractional anisotropyGleason scoremagnetic resonance imagingprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID29250155
PMCPMC5729705
OpenAlexW2766314538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.