ArticleFrontiers in neurology2017
Visual Tracking in Development and Aging.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Portable eye-tracking as a reliable assessment of oculomotor, cognitive and reaction time function: Normative data for 18-45 year old.PloS one · 2021Trial
- Oculomotor Profiles in Children Wearing Different Myopia Control Lenses: A Real-World Eye Tracking Study.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Dual statistical models link baseline visual attention measure to risk for significant symptomatic concussion in sports.Concussion (London, England) · 2023Article
- Age-related decline of online visuomotor adaptation: a combined effect of deteriorations of motor anticipation and execution.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2023Article
- Developmental Changes in the Magnitude of Representational Momentum Among Nursery School Children: A Longitudinal Study.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Proof of Concept of Novel Visuo-Spatial-Motor Fall Prevention Training for Old People.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Abnormalities of smooth pursuit in Parkinson's disease: A systematic review.Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders · 2021Review
- The Contribution of Oculomotor Functions to Rates of Visual Information Processing in Younger and Older Adults.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Concussion Disrupts Normal Brain White Matter Microstructural Symmetry.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Article
- Saccades and driving.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2019Article
- Working memory load improves diagnostic performance of smooth pursuit eye movement in mild traumatic brain injury patients with protracted recovery.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Association of Visual Tracking Metrics With Post-concussion Symptomatology.Frontiers in neurology · 2018Article
- Concussion Subtype Identification With the Rivermead Post-concussion Symptoms Questionnaire.Frontiers in neurology · 2018Article
- Saccade reaction test for the assessment of cognitive readiness.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A moving target is visually tracked with a combination of smooth pursuit and saccades. Human visual tracking eye movement develops through early childhood and adolescence, and declines in senescence. However, the knowledge regarding performance changes over the life course is based on data from distinct age groups in isolation using different procedures, and thus is fragmented. We sought to describe the age-dependence of visual tracking performance across a wide age range and compare it to that of simple visuo-manual reaction time. We studied a cross-sectional sample of 143 subjects aged 7-82 years old (37% male). Eye movements were recorded using video-oculography, while subjects viewed a computer screen and tracked a small target moving along a circular trajectory at a constant speed. For simple reaction time (SRT) measures, series of key presses that subjects made in reaction to cue presentation on a computer monitor were recorded using a standard software. The positional precision and smooth pursuit velocity gain of visual tracking followed a U-shaped trend over age, with best performances achieved between the ages of 20 and 50 years old. A U-shaped trend was also found for mean reaction time in agreement with the existing literature. Inter-individual variability was evident at any age in both visual tracking and reaction time metrics. Despite the similarity in the overall developmental and aging trend, correlations were not found between visual tracking and reaction time performances after subtracting the effects of age. Furthermore, while a statistically significant difference between the sexes was found for mean SRT in the sample, a similar difference was not found for any of the visual tracking metrics. Therefore, the cognitive constructs and their neural substrates supporting visual tracking and reaction time performances appear largely independent. In summary, age is an important covariate for visual tracking performance, especially for a pediatric population. Since visual tracking performance metrics may provide signatures of abnormal neurological or cognitive states independent of reaction time-based metrics, further understanding of age-dependent variations in normal visual tracking behavior is necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.