Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29249949›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2017

Modulation of Neural Activity during Guided Viewing of Visual Art.

Guillermo Herrera-Arcos, Jesús Tamez-Duque, Elsa Y Acosta-De-Anda, Kevin Kwan-Loo, Mayra de-Alba, Ulises Tamez-Duque, Jose L Contreras-Vidal, Rogelio Soto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Guillermo Herrera-ArcosTecnológico de Monterrey, National Robotics Laboratory, School of Engineering and Sciences, Monterrey, Mexico.
Jesús Tamez-DuqueINDI Ingeniería y Diseño S.A.P.I. de C.V., Monterrey, Mexico.
Elsa Y Acosta-De-AndaTecnológico de Monterrey, National Robotics Laboratory, School of Engineering and Sciences, Monterrey, Mexico.
Kevin Kwan-LooTecnológico de Monterrey, National Robotics Laboratory, School of Engineering and Sciences, Monterrey, Mexico.
Mayra de-AlbaTecnológico de Monterrey, National Robotics Laboratory, School of Engineering and Sciences, Monterrey, Mexico.
Ulises Tamez-DuqueINDI Ingeniería y Diseño S.A.P.I. de C.V., Monterrey, Mexico.
Jose L Contreras-VidalTecnológico de Monterrey, National Robotics Laboratory, School of Engineering and Sciences, Monterrey, Mexico.
Rogelio SotoTecnológico de Monterrey, National Robotics Laboratory, School of Engineering and Sciences, Monterrey, Mexico.
Tecnológico de Monterrey · MXInterface (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mobile Brain-Body Imaging (MoBI) technology was deployed to record multi-modal data from 209 participants to examine the brain's response to artistic stimuli at the Museo de Arte Contemporáneo (MARCO) in Monterrey, México. EEG signals were recorded as the subjects walked through the exhibit in guided groups of 6-8 people. Moreover, guided groups were either provided with an explanation of each art piece (Guided-E), or given no explanation (Guided-NE). The study was performed using portable Muse (InteraXon, Inc, Toronto, ON, Canada) headbands with four dry electrodes located at AF7, AF8, TP9, and TP10. Each participant performed a baseline (BL) control condition devoid of artistic stimuli and selected his/her favorite piece of art (FP) during the guided tour. In this study, we report data related to participants' demographic information and aesthetic preference as well as effects of art viewing on neural activity (EEG) in a select subgroup of 18-30 year-old subjects (Nc = 25) that generated high-quality EEG signals, on both BL and FP conditions. Dependencies on gender, sensor placement, and presence or absence of art explanation were also analyzed. After denoising, clustering of spectral EEG models was used to identify neural patterns associated with BL and FP conditions. Results indicate statistically significant suppression of beta band frequencies (15-25 Hz) in the prefrontal electrodes (AF7 and AF8) during appreciation of subjects' favorite painting, compared to the BL condition, which was significantly different from EEG responses to non-favorite paintings (NFP). No significant differences in brain activity in relation to the presence or absence of explanation during exhibit tours were found. Moreover, a frontal to posterior asymmetry in neural activity was observed, for both BL and FP conditions. These findings provide new information about frequency-related effects of preferred art viewing in brain activity, and support the view that art appreciation is independent of the artists' intent or original interpretation and related to the individual message that viewers themselves provide to each piece.

Indexed as

aestheticsartBCIbeta bandEEGMoBIneuroaestheticsnon-laboratory

Identifiers

PMID29249949
PMCPMC5714858
OpenAlexW2770860702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.