ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2017
Determining Excitatory and Inhibitory Neuronal Activity from Multimodal fMRI Data Using a Generative Hemodynamic Model.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 130 citations in OpenAlex.
- BOLD response delays represent local cortical processing.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026Article
- 7 Tesla fMRI characterisation of the cortical-depth-dependent BOLD response in early human development.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Minimum-Phase Property of the Hemodynamic Response Function, and Implications for Granger Causality in fMRI.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
- Detectability and cortical depth dependence of stimulus-driven high-frequency BOLD oscillations in the human primary somatosensory and motor cortex.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Label-free photoacoustic computed tomography of visually evoked responses in the primary visual cortex and four subcortical retinorecipient nuclei of anesthetized mice.Neurophotonics · 2024Article
- Transformer-aided dynamic causal model for scalable estimation of effective connectivity.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Inhibitory temporo-parietal effective connectivity is associated with explicit memory performance in older adults.iScience · 2023Article
- A quantitative model for human neurovascular coupling with translated mechanisms from animals.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Dynamic Effective Connectivity using Physiologically informed Dynamic Causal Model with Recurrent Units: A functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging simulation study.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
- Reduced brain activity during a working memory task in middle-aged apolipoprotein E ε4 carriers with overweight/obesity.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- Changes in hemodynamic response function components reveal specific changes in neurovascular coupling in type 2 diabetes.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Imaging faster neural dynamics with fast fMRI: A need for updated models of the hemodynamic response.Progress in neurobiology · 2021Review
- mGluCell reports · 2021Article
- Voltage-Sensitive Dye versus Intrinsic Signal Optical Imaging: Comparison of Tactile Responses in Primary and Secondary Somatosensory Cortices of Rats.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Ageing and the Ipsilateral M1 BOLD Response: A Connectivity Study.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Identification of Negative BOLD Responses in Epilepsy Using Windkessel Models.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- Article
- fMRI in Non-human Primate: A Review on Factors That Can Affect Interpretation and Dynamic Causal Modeling Application.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Review
- Spectro-Temporal Processing in a Two-Stream Computational Model of Auditory Cortex.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2019Article
- Increasing robustness of pairwise methods for effective connectivity in magnetic resonance imaging by using fractional moment series of BOLD signal distributions.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Hemodynamic responses, in general, and the blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) fMRI signal, in particular, provide an indirect measure of neuronal activity. There is strong evidence that the BOLD response correlates well with post-synaptic changes, induced by changes in the excitatory and inhibitory (E-I) balance between active neuronal populations. Typical BOLD responses exhibit transients, such as the early-overshoot and post-stimulus undershoot, that can be linked to transients in neuronal activity, but they can also result from vascular uncoupling between cerebral blood flow (CBF) and venous cerebral blood volume (venous CBV). Recently, we have proposed a novel generative hemodynamic model of the BOLD signal within the dynamic causal modeling framework, inspired by physiological observations, called P-DCM (Havlicek et al., 2015). We demonstrated the generative model's ability to more accurately model commonly observed neuronal and vascular transients in single regions but also effective connectivity between multiple brain areas (Havlicek et al., 2017b). In this paper, we additionally demonstrate the versatility of the generative model to jointly explain dynamic relationships between neuronal and hemodynamic physiological variables underlying the BOLD signal using multi-modal data. For this purpose, we utilized three distinct data-sets of experimentally induced responses in the primary visual areas measured in human, cat, and monkey brain, respectively: (1) CBF and BOLD responses; (2) CBF, total CBV, and BOLD responses (Jin and Kim, 2008); and (3) positive and negative neuronal and BOLD responses (Shmuel et al., 2006). By fitting the generative model to the three multi-modal experimental data-sets, we showed that the presence or absence of dynamic features in the BOLD signal is not an unambiguous indication of presence or absence of those features on the neuronal level. Nevertheless, the generative model that takes into account the dynamics of the physiological mechanisms underlying the BOLD response allowed dissociating neuronal from vascular transients and deducing excitatory and inhibitory neuronal activity time-courses from BOLD data alone and from multi-modal data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.