ArticleThe Journal of veterinary medical science2018
Characterization of four Escherichia albertii isolates collected from animals living in Antarctica and Patagonia.
Article in The Journal of veterinary medical science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physicochemical and sensory characterization of functional synbiotic Labneh fortified with the bacteriocin-producing Lactiplantibacillus plantarum strain GA7 and nano-encapsulated Tirmania pinoyi extract.Microbial cell factories · 2025Article
- Genomic characterization of multidrug-resistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Differential Cytotoxic Effects of Cell-Free Supernatants of Emerging PathogensMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- The genomic epidemiology of Escherichia albertii infecting humans and birds in Great Britain.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Isolation and characterization of Escherichia albertii from wild and safeguarded animals in Okayama Prefecture and its prefectural borders, Japan.The Journal of veterinary medical science · 2022Article
- Microbiology and Epidemiology ofMicroorganisms · 2022Review
- Comparative genomics of Chinese and international isolates ofMicrobial genomics · 2021Article
- The Changing Face of the FamilyClinical microbiology reviews · 2021Review
- DNA sequencing, genomes and genetic markers of microbes on fruits and vegetables.Microbial biotechnology · 2021Review
- PacBio Genome Sequences of Eight Escherichia albertii Strains Isolated from Humans in the United States.Microbiology resource announcements · 2019Article
- Non-biogroup 1 or 2 Strains of the Emerging Zoonotic PathogenFrontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
- Draft Genome Sequence of the Intimin-Positive Enteropathogenic Escherichia albertii Strain MBT-EA1, Isolated from Lettuce.Genome announcements · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Escherichia albertii is a recently discovered species with a limited number of well characterized strains. The aim of this study was to characterize four of the E. albertii strains, which were among 41 identified Escherichia strains isolated from the feces of living animals on James Ross Island, Antarctica, and Isla Magdalena, Patagonia. Sequencing of 16S rDNA, automated ribotyping, and rep-PCR were used to identify the four E. albertii isolates. Phylogenetic analyses based on multi-locus sequence typing showed these isolates to be genetically most similar to the members of E. albertii phylogroup G3. These isolates encoded several virulence factors including those, which are characteristic of E. albertii (cytolethal distending toxin and intimin) as well as bacteriocin determinants that typically have a very low prevalence in E. coli strains (D, E7). Moreover, E. albertii protein extracts caused cell cycle arrest in human cell line A375, probably because of cytolethal distending toxin activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.