SynthesisAmerican journal of infection control2018
Lessons from the domestic Ebola response: Improving health care system resilience to high consequence infectious diseases.
Synthesis in American journal of infection control, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mental health of clinical staff working in high-risk epidemic and pandemic health emergencies a rapid review of the evidence and living meta-analysis.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2021Pooled it
- Interventions to support the resilience and mental health of frontline health and social care professionals during and after a disease outbreak, epidemic or pandemic: a mixed methods systematic review.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- When It Is Not Measured, How Then Will It Be Planned for? WaSH a Critical Indicator for Universal Health Coverage in Kenya.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Pooled it
- Organizational resilience in nursing: a concept analysis using Rodgers' evolutionary approach.Health research policy and systems · 2025Review
- The Concept and Scope of Resilience Against Infectious Disease Outbreaks.China CDC weekly · 2025Article
- Streamlining Preparedness: A Practical Pathway to Special Pathogens Management.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2025Article
- The contribution of a complex systems-based approach to progressive social resilience.Health (London, England : 1997) · 2024Article
- Community interventions for pandemic preparedness: A scoping review of pandemic preparedness lessons from HIV, COVID-19, and other public health emergencies of international concern.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- A resilience view on health system resilience: a scoping review of empirical studies and reviews.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Rapid evidence review: Policy actions for the integration of public health and health care in the United States.Frontiers in public health · 2023Review
- Health systems resilience in practice: a scoping review to identify strategies for building resilience.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- The role of health systems for health security: a scoping review revealing the need for improved conceptual and practical linkages.Globalization and health · 2022Article
- Health system resilience: a literature review of empirical research.Health policy and planning · 2020Review
- A checklist to improve health system resilience to infectious disease outbreaks and natural hazards.BMJ global health · 2020Review
- What makes health systems resilient against infectious disease outbreaks and natural hazards? Results from a scoping review.BMC public health · 2019Article
- Ebola Virus Disease: Clinical Challenges, Recognition, and Management.The Nursing clinics of North America · 2019Review
- Operationalization of an Expanded Anteroom in a COVID-19-Dedicated Hospital in South Korea.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe domestic response to the West Africa Ebola virus disease (EVD) epidemic from 2014-2016 provides a unique opportunity to distill lessons learned about health sector planning and operations from those individuals directly involved. This research project aimed to identify and integrate these lessons into an actionable checklist that can improve health sector resilience to future high-consequence infectious disease (HCID) events.
methodsInterviews (N = 73) were completed with individuals involved in the domestic EVD response in 4 cities (Atlanta, Dallas, New York, and Omaha), and included individuals who worked in academia, emergency management, government, health care, law, media, and public health during the response. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed qualitatively. Two focus groups were then conducted to expand on themes identified in the interviews. Using these themes, an evidence-informed checklist was developed and vetted for completeness and feasibility by an expert advisory group.
resultsSalient themes identified included health care facility issues-specifically identifying assessment and treatment hospitals, isolation and treatment unit layout, waste management, community relations, patient identification, patient isolation, limitations on treatment, laboratories, and research considerations-and health care workforce issues-specifically psychosocial impact, unit staffing, staff training, and proper personal protective equipment.
conclusionsThe experiences of those involved in the domestic Ebola response provide critical lessons that can help strengthen resilience of health care systems and improve future responses to HCID events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.