Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29249206›Full record

ArticlePrimary health care research & development2018

Early health technology assessment of future clinical decision rule aided triage of patients presenting with acute chest pain in primary care.

Robert T A Willemsen, Michelle M A Kip, Hendrik Koffijberg, Ron Kusters, Frank Buntinx, Jan F C Glatz, Geert Jan Dinant, ‘RAPIDA’ – Study Team (‘RAPIDA’: RAPid Test for Investigating Complaints Possibly Due to Acute Coronary Syndrome)

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Primary health care research & development, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Robert T A Willemsen1Department of Family Medicine,Maastricht University,Maastricht,The Netherlands.
Michelle M A Kip2Department of Health Technology and Services Research,MIRA Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine,University of Twente,Enschede,The Netherlands.
Hendrik Koffijberg2Department of Health Technology and Services Research,MIRA Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine,University of Twente,Enschede,The Netherlands.
Ron Kusters2Department of Health Technology and Services Research,MIRA Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine,University of Twente,Enschede,The Netherlands.
Frank Buntinx1Department of Family Medicine,Maastricht University,Maastricht,The Netherlands.
Jan F C Glatz5Department of Genetics & Cell Biology,Maastricht University,Maastricht,The Netherlands.
Geert Jan Dinant1Department of Family Medicine,Maastricht University,Maastricht,The Netherlands.
‘RAPIDA’ – Study Team (‘RAPIDA’: RAPid Test for Investigating Complaints Possibly Due to Acute Coronary Syndrome)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of the paper is to estimate the number of patients presenting with chest pain suspected of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in primary care and to calculate possible cost effects of a future clinical decision rule (CDR) incorporating a point-of-care test (PoCT) as compared with current practice. The annual incidence of chest pain, referrals and ACS in primary care was estimated based on a literature review and on a Dutch and Belgian registration study. A health economic model was developed to calculate the potential impact of a future CDR on costs and effects (ie, correct referral decisions), in several scenarios with varying correct referral decisions. One-way, two-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to test robustness of the model outcome to changes in input parameters. Annually, over one million patient contacts in primary care in the Netherlands concern chest pain. Currently, referral of eventual ACS negative patients (false positives, FPs) is estimated to cost €1,448 per FP patient, with total annual cost exceeding 165 million Euros in the Netherlands. Based on 'international data', at least a 29% reduction in FPs is required for the addition of a PoCT as part of a CDR to become cost-saving, and an additional €16 per chest pain patient (ie, 16.4 million Euros annually in the Netherlands) is saved for every further 10% relative decrease in FPs. Sensitivity analyses revealed that the model outcome was robust to changes in model inputs, with costs outcomes mainly driven by costs of FPs and costs of PoCT. If PoCT-aided triage of patients with chest pain in primary care could improve exclusion of ACS, this CDR could lead to a considerable reduction in annual healthcare costs as compared with current practice.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesAcute Coronary SyndromeAcute PainChest PainHumansPrimary Health CareTechnology Assessment, BiomedicalTriagebiomarkerscardiovascular diseaseclinical decision rulecost effectsemergency medicineprimary care

Identifiers

PMID29249206
PMCPMC6452953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.