Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29249155›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteome research2018

Exploring ECD on a Benchtop Q Exactive Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer.

Kyle L Fort, Christian N Cramer, Valery G Voinov, Yury V Vasil'ev, Nathan I Lopez, Joseph S Beckman, Albert J R Heck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteome research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. To 200,000ACS central science · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Chemical science · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kyle L FortBiomolecular Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research and Utrecht Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University , Utrecht 3584 CH, The Netherlands.
Christian N CramerBiomolecular Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research and Utrecht Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University , Utrecht 3584 CH, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9455-4212
Valery G Voinove-MSion, Inc. , 2121 NE Jack London Drive, Corvallis, Oregon 97330, United States.
Yury V Vasil'eve-MSion, Inc. , 2121 NE Jack London Drive, Corvallis, Oregon 97330, United States.
Nathan I Lopeze-MSion, Inc. , 2121 NE Jack London Drive, Corvallis, Oregon 97330, United States.
Joseph S Beckmane-MSion, Inc. , 2121 NE Jack London Drive, Corvallis, Oregon 97330, United States.
Albert J R HeckBiomolecular Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research and Utrecht Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University , Utrecht 3584 CH, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2405-4404

Funding

Practical Mass Spectrometry Upgrade for Identifying Fragile Protein Modifications by ECDR44GM122131 · NIGMS · E-MSION, INC. · PI VOINOV, VALERY G. · 2017 to 2018
$1.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R44 GM122131
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the application of mass spectrometry intensifies in scope and diversity, the need for advanced instrumentation addressing a wide variety of analytical needs also increases. To this end, many modern, top-end mass spectrometers are designed or modified to include a wider range of fragmentation technologies, for example, ECD, ETD, EThcD, and UVPD. Still, the majority of instrument platforms are limited to more conventional methods, such as CID and HCD. While these latter methods have performed well, the less conventional fragmentation methods have been shown to lead to increased information in many applications including middle-down proteomics, top-down proteomics, glycoproteomics, and disulfide bond mapping. We describe the modification of the popular Q Exactive Orbitrap mass spectrometer to extend its fragmentation capabilities to include ECD. We show that this modification allows ≥85% matched ion intensity to originate from ECD fragment ion types as well as provides high sequence coverage (≥60%) of intact proteins and high fragment identification rates with ∼70% of ion signals matched. Finally, the ECD implementation promotes selective disulfide bond dissociation, facilitating the identification of disulfide-linked peptide conjugates. Collectively, this modification extends the capabilities of the Q Exactive Orbitrap mass spectrometer to a range of new applications.

Indexed as

ElectronsProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalAmino Acid SequenceDisulfidesEquipment DesignHumansIonsMyoglobinPeptide FragmentsProteolysisProteomicsSubstance PTandem Mass SpectrometryUbiquitinDisulfidesIonsMyoglobinPeptide FragmentsSubstance PUbiquitinbottom-updisulfideelectron capture dissociationmass spectrometrymiddle-downOrbitrappost-translational modificationsproteinQ Exactivetop-down

Identifiers

PMID29249155
PMCPMC5799867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.